DANIEL ROBERT MAZURTHE ARCHITECTURE OF BELIEFShop the books ↗

Memoir · First five chapters

COR Values

Read the opening. Hear the story.

Begin with memory, then follow the questions into a family’s history. These opening chapters move from Syracuse to Miami and back through the lives that shaped the memoir.

COR Values — book cover by Daniel Robert Mazur
Part of The Architecture of Belief

LISTEN WHILE YOU READ

Five chapters. Your own pace.

Listen to the five recordings supplied by Daniel Robert Mazur, or read at your own pace below.

Chapter 1 · Off at Grandma’s

Read this chapter ↓Open audio separately ↗

THE OPENING FIVE CHAPTERS

Settle into the story.

Chapter 1

Off at Grandma’s

Chapter menu ↑

February 1987

I sat there in that clone of a home on a city’s checkerboard street, 1210 Oak Street, Syracuse, to be exact, an address tamped into my mind by a collection of inextricably memorable visits. It had been a heavily traversed go-between, that street leading to my grandparents’ home, one of innumerable others as tritely named—after trees. Unable to determine reasons there, I considered the effects. I was tormented without coherent reverie of years long past, imprisoned by a morphing of assailants, an army of vengeful snippets from my distorted recollections that conjured the attack. The comforts of normality gone, I brooded in a wake of agony. Simpler, carefree days long past had been replaced by skewed ideations, a muddling of ponderings perpetually and incessantly punishing me.

My introspection resuming, I stood and made my way to the sink, the one where Grandma washed her dishes. She did it with her bare hands and never without scalding hot water, which I had imagined should burn. I often presumed her thinking was, Be sure to kill the germs.

Above the sink on the windowsill, four husky tomatoes were perched, basking in the sunlight, gradually reddening. Through the glass, a gray goose-down parka with a tunnel-shaped hood was in full bloom, keeping a snowblower pilot warm and dry. It moved quickly—flew—my grandfather steering his John Deere from one end of the narrow driveway to the other, leading from the wood-named street to his tool-filled garage. Small tools, that is, not the power machines like the drill press and table saw in his basement. But it was July, and there was no snow outside. Two seasons had passed, but the chill remained in my mind and in the wearisome snowbanks that Grandpa blazed through. It wasn’t a hallucination or an apparition, this aberration from my firm-footed past, this new place my family said was of my choosing, where I was to blame, even if I was only a moth drawn to the flame.

It was early afternoon, one of several bound to be spent there. I was twenty-five years old and self-employed with unattended business, inwardly pining. I was not the conductor of my emotions, and I was only able to comment and observe my behavior as if I were not the creator but a prisoner to seemingly arbitrary events, sources unknown, possibly derived from, associated with, and/or related to fistfuls of unaskable questions. Questions unanswered leading to more questions, tamped into my mind and conjured with hyperthymestic recall. They threatened my sanity as interminable introspection led me toward beliefs contrary to the common-sense conclusions of the surrounding majority, entangling bewildering thoughts with other background noise that I strove to escape while attempting to travel toward more tolerable destinations. The unknown and uncertainty persisted at the front and in the periphery, incessantly punishing me as I drifted away on a captainless ship toward an unseen shore.

Making my way to the living room, I settled on my aunt’s upholstered sofa, the kitchen remaining in my line of sight. Unsure of how I got there, I wrapped a blanket adorned with flowery shapes around me, a craft my mother made from a kit in a K-mart store, or was it Switz’s? In the far corner of the room, my grandfather stretched out comfortably in his beige leather La-Z-Boy chair. It was not a fractured memory; he was actually there. He tucked a twined white cord under his blanket. It extended from his ear to his collar where it disappeared, becoming visible again where a torn sock exposed a circlet of heel flesh, its remaining journey to the TV fully exposed. Both of us fiddled with our quilts, adjusting to the rapidly changing temperatures in the poorly insulated room. Above us in the second-floor bedroom, my grandmother waited for her cue—the creaking of two wooden steps—indicating enough TV had been watched. It would happen when the national anthem started playing, the broadcasts concluded, and it was time to sleep.

I had been in their bedroom before, through another door where more creaky steps led to the attic. Across from their bedroom were two more rooms, one of them my aunt slept in, its walls covered in metallic purple paper, a gilding of fleeting taste. Adjacent to hers was a guest room flush with hunting and wildlife imagery. A picture of Dad, clad in his big-game hunting regalia, hung on the wall. It was a framed 1970s newspaper clipping, featuring a buck with an impressive array of high-scoring antler points, its tongue protruding. Another wall displayed a painting of geese in flight, the creatures disproportionately painted in an undeservingly framed presentation. Next to it was my favorite, another bird, a cuckoo that appeared noisily every hour, seemingly desperate for attention. And finally, a showcase on the floor exhibited a mélange of firearms, a generational theme of family interests.

“It’s up center field, going, going, it’s out of the park!” Grandpa’s whoop added to my woolgathering. TV sports and westerns were joylessly imponderable without the company of my grandfather yet immeasurably rewarding with him. The sight of a ball hit long and far, a gunfight featuring John Wayne, or a scene with Larry, Curly, and Moe brought both consoling and tormenting ruminations during every unsolicited appearance.

There was a car accident that morning on my way there to that clone of a home on the go-between wood-named street. If I had driven too fast or too slow, it would have been me lying flat on my back on the street. I intentionally varied my acceleration, deviating from the posted speed limits, and took routes I had never traversed before, with the exception of that final, unavoidable go-between street where my grandparents lived. Memories and moments both near and far left me struggling to comprehend the distances and the differences between destiny and destinations. Was I haunted by evil’s whisper, a ghostly echo of imposed theology, or did its seed lie dormant within, entwined in the mystery of genes and biology?

I sat there in my grandparents’ house on my aunt’s upholstered sofa, my mother’s quilt wrapped around me. My pursuit of warmth remembered, vacated by the disparaging of family and friends. As darkness settled in, sleep eluded me. I delved into introspection, contemplating whether my troubles found their roots in the stories I had heard, in moments of flawed judgments, errors, and transgressions. I had lucid moments, memories of better times—camping at Green Lakes with the family, my grandfather strumming his mandolin after Sunday dinners—but they quickly faded, giving way to countless episodes of the antithesis. If I was better than perceived, was embedded theology rendering my body immobile and twisting my mind? The questions loomed.

As I continued to sit on my aunt’s upholstered sofa, wrapped in my mother’s quilt, I wished it would warm me. In the depths of my contemplation, I immersed myself in murky thoughts, reflecting on the years of rejected dogma that persisted within me, unresolved and dormant, waiting to be transformed into clear, concise instructions akin to the metaphorical “preparatory command” that guided a soldier marching forward.

Had the malevolent forces of Satan’s demons been summoned, stirred awake by my yearning for self-assurance? From the captivating depths, a formidable presence emerged in the unexplored corners of my mind. The foreboding thirteenth chapter of Revelation from the Christian Bible unveiled a timeless, aeonian doctrine, the ominous arrival of “the beast” itself. This wicked entity visited me not once but repeatedly for seven consecutive nights until the fateful moment when someone dared to wield a gleaming steel blade, seeking to extinguish my existence with a fatal strike.

Dinner beckoned. The tantalizing aroma of Grandma’s sauce filled the air. The thought of testing the pasta’s al dente perfection stirred my hunger. I put Mom’s quilt back up on the sofa, nice and neat the way Grandpa did. Then I followed my grandfather’s meticulous footsteps, my anticipation growing. The joy of savoring a satisfying meal awaited!

But wait, where was everyone? Faint echoes of a distant game reached my ears, leaving me feeling bewildered and alone. Had time slipped away, leaving me in surreal solitude? The Sunday pasta tradition, once so cherished, now stood before me, but I was uncertain if it was a tangible reality or just a fading memory from a distance. Where were David and Paul? Had they chosen to stay behind? A whirlwind of questions danced within my mind as I grappled with the day and my place in it. With it came a seemingly simple realization. Ah, yes, there I was at my grandparents’ house, seated comfortably on their sofa. And amidst the assortment of emotions, the mysterious prophecy remained, poised to reveal its hidden truths.

My father had introduced me to the realm of devils and demons when I was eleven years old. Within the walls of the church in Euclid, I was exposed to a world of spiritual warfare, where exorcisms were common occurrences. Together with an eccentric group of long-haired hippies, the peculiar congregation formed, sitting in circular formation on cold metal folding chairs, as if preparing for an otherworldly battle.

In the midst of our rhythmic recitations of the psalms, I joined the collective frenzy, tambourine in hand, unleashing percussive vibrations that seemed to beckon the divine. The air crackled with fervor as my father’s voice soared above the tumultuous chorus, invoking the Almighty with his fervent plea, “Bring those no one else wants, oh Lord.” Those words resonated deep within me, casting a spell that shaped my life for years to come.

Among the intriguing figures of that congregation, one stood out in particular—David Gentile, the epitome of metamorphosis. I witnessed his astonishing transformation during a mesmerizing tent meeting in the distant town of Parish, an event that is immortalized in the pages of our family photo albums. I can still see him now, his long locks falling to the floor as a pair of silver shears severed his ties to the past, leaving him reborn, both physically and spiritually.

But it was not just the images captured in faded photographs that remained in my mind; it was the intangible impressions, the lingering sensations that had imprinted themselves upon my very being. I could still hear the resounding echo of my father’s voice, resonating with unwavering conviction as he held David’s face in his hands, unveiling the existence of evil to the unsuspecting “babes in Christ.” With fierce determination, he proclaimed, “I cast you out, Satan, in the name of Jesus!” The energy in the room was palpable, as if the forces of good and evil were waging an invisible battle right before our eyes.

Amidst the ever-changing landscape of our small town, a new preacher arrived, heralding winds of change. And in the heart of this transformation stood “Dancing David,” a whirlwind of exuberance and devotion. Every gathering became a spectacle as he raised his arms to the heavens, spinning with wild abandon at the center of our circle. His frenzied movements painted a vivid picture, his rosy cheeks and sweat-drenched clothes a testament to the intensity of his faith. It was as if he had been reborn from the depths of his past, redeemed by the boundless grace of a higher power.

Guided by my father’s wise counsel, this former hippie tapped into his inner drive and unveiled his sharp business acumen. Through his endeavors, he cultivated a reputation as a discerning and astute entrepreneur, not only for his own prosperity but also for fostering employment opportunities for fellow Christians. His unwavering devotion and business success earned him admiration as a cherished member of the church and a revered figure among the congregation. David’s journey served as a compelling demonstration of the harmonious coexistence that can be achieved between spirituality and worldly achievements, inspiring others to embrace the richness of the sacred and secular dimensions of life.

In the midst of these fervent displays, I found myself consumed by jealousy, an envy that birthed an audacious fabrication within me. One fateful night, amidst the clatter of metal folding chairs, I could no longer resist the allure of attention. With a concoction of nerves and deceit, I proclaimed to the congregation, “I have a vision. I can see Jesus on the cross.” The words hung in the air, pregnant with expectation and disbelief as eyes turned toward me.

At that moment my heart pounded in my chest, and my cheeks flushed crimson with a mixture of excitement and trepidation. But as quickly as doubt threatened to engulf me, a wave of applause crashed over my fragile façade, immersing me in a sea of acceptance. The taste of validation was intoxicating and bitter, leaving me yearning for more yet questioning the cost of such triumphs.

On the car ride home, the relentless waves of praise reverberated within me, sinking deeper into the recesses of my being. With each word and expression received, a peculiar sense of unease settled within me. It marked the inception of a relentless fret, a seed planted in the fertile ground of my consciousness. It grew silently yet persistently. Nurtured by the paradoxical experiences of a realm claiming truth and godliness, I found myself ensnared in an enigmatic dance, where rewards were bestowed for the darkest deeds.

“Take heed, for I shall grant you sight,” an ethereal voice whispered into my ear, its words sending a shiver down my spine. With an audible delivery that evoked awe and intrigue, this ethereal presence from out of the blue bestowed its message upon me. Eager to unravel its purpose, I whole-heartedly acknowledged its presence. It was not just a faint repetition but a palpable and mysterious force, seemingly materializing from the void, beckoning me to uncover the depths of its intentions.

“Alright, I’m listening. What do you desire?”

“Embrace the path before you,” the spectral voice urged, the essence of its words compelling me to heed its call. As if obeying an unseen directive, an unyielding urge emerged within me, persuading me to embark upon a profound exploration of the possibilities that my upbringing had integrated into the essence of my being.

The healings, supposedly brought about by divine intervention, ignited sparks of curiosity and kindled flames of inquiry within me. Such a day it was during my formative years in elementary school when an innocuous act led me to guide a friend to an unconventional seat—the rim of a bathroom toilet. “Now, straighten your legs, and align your feet side by side,” I said, mirroring the practices observed in church. It was believed that if one suffered from a back problem, one leg would appear longer than the other. This fascinating phenomenon captivated the attention of churchgoers and permeated discussions within the intimate confines of homes, becoming a topic often raised at dining room tables.

One memory of a profound moment within the sacred confines of the church remained vivid in my mind. It was a remarkable occasion when a fervent congregant stepped forward, testifying about the severe impairment that burdened his back. The folding chairs encircled him, their arrangement symbolizing the unity and shared spirit among those gathered. As anticipation filled the air, a crackling energy enveloped the room.

In the midst of that charged atmosphere, the afflicted man took his seat, his feet cradled by my father’s fingertips. This poignant scene depicted a profound connection—an ethereal bridge between one in need and a conduit for divine intervention. Observing the misalignment, my father drew attention to the issue. “This is the problem. Look at his feet. They’re uneven, one leg shorter than the other,” he proclaimed with unwavering conviction.

Then, with a commanding voice that resounded through the sparsely furnished room, my father unleashed his words, shattering any possibility of doubt. “Be healed, in the name of Jesus! Back problems, be gone!” Every eye fixed on the man’s legs, and as if responding to the call, a miraculous sight rewarded their gaze. It seemed as though one of the man’s feet began to move, gradually aligning itself with its counterpart, a testament to the transformative power at work. His voice filled with joy and gratitude echoed through the room, proclaiming, “I’m healed, I’m healed! Praise Jesus, my back is free from pain!”

Overwhelmed with excitement, the congregation erupted in a roar, a jubilant celebration of the divine intervention they had witnessed. The room resonated with an outpouring of spiritual fervor, as many among the congregation spoke in tongues, their voices harmonizing in a sacred symphony of faith and praise.

Curiosity consumed me as I pondered the nature of the applause that followed the so-called “miracle.” Was it deserved or was it as misplaced as the adulation for my fabricated story, my vision of Jesus on the cross? On that day in the boys’ restroom at Morgan Road Elementary, I embarked on a quest for answers to these burning questions.

In stark contrast to the folding chairs encircling the faithful, my venture commenced without any theatrical flourishes. There were no mystic incantations or indiscernible intonations, only a heartfelt plea directed to Jesus Christ, beseeching him to heal my friend’s ailing back. Rooted in memories, I positioned his feet unevenly before maneuvering them from side by side. The outcome proved unremarkable, lacking the grandeur I had hoped to replicate, but it still mirrored the remembered experiences.

As I contemplated the scene, I wondered if heightened efforts might have incited applause and cheers from my observing friends, akin to the fervor I had witnessed at church. Could it be that these so-called miracles were intricate performances, driven by desires similar to my own, guiding my father’s deliberate movements of the man’s feet?

These ponderings, intertwined with skepticism, fueled my yearning for truth. I resolved to delve deeper, determined to unravel the mystery that surrounded these extraordinary occurrences.

The chilly air seeped into my surroundings once more, kindling a yearning for the comforting embrace of my quilt. Ah, there it was, draped upon me. Still, an unexplained shiver lingered, refusing to dissipate. Then the voice whispered into my ear once again: “You see me now. Choose.” Startled, I pondered the source of these cryptic words. Could it be the demon taunting me once more?

I found myself back within the familiar, cozy confines of my grandparents’ house, settled on their sofa. It was a serene Sunday afternoon, a cherished time when my family gathered for a heartwarming macaroni dinner. Or perhaps I had traversed the boundaries of life and death, my soul conjuring a surreal fusion of memories and apparitions after a fateful car crash. Rest eluded me as I grappled with this perplexing trial, teetering on the precipice of existence and the unknown.

In a swift motion, as though whisked away by some temporal force, I relived the sensation in the peaceful surroundings of my grandparents’ home, sinking deeper into their sofa’s embrace. The television screen came alive with the vibrant spectacle of a bowling tournament, and I watched alongside my grandfather. Amidst the exhilarating competition, a captivating dynamic unfurled—a competitor inadvertently exposed a tapestry of inadequacies, a stark contrast to the grandeur he sought to project. Despite his fervent efforts, no deliberate gaze, choreographed movement, or carefully selected words could conceal the truth. The discord that clouded his morning with his wife, the burdens of financial strife, and the relentless battle against self-worth were laid bare, echoing the poignant observations I had made at Wendy’s just the day before.

Indulging in the flavors of a delectable Dave’s Single cheeseburger while savoring a refreshing sip of Coke, my attention was captivated by a stranger entering the bustling fast-food establishment. Time seemed to freeze as he contemplated his order, radiating an aura of introspection. Though our paths had never intertwined, his essence materialized before me, as palpable as the sofa I was resting upon. Within my vision, I caught glimpses of the man’s intricate character, his identity shrouded in a relentless series of disappointments that had diluted his spirit. It was revealed that he was a high school basketball coach, driven to shape the lives of a fiercely competitive team, an endeavor fueled by the pursuit of self-worth and validation.

Within the luminous realm of the television screen and the tangible world, these personal endeavors served a shared purpose—to awaken a profound sense of self-awareness within those who partook in them. This revelation sprang forth from my own acute self-awareness, a quality that often appeared lacking in the individuals I observed. The unspoken recognition that arose within me amused others, but it remained concealed and safeguarded, shielding me from the potential repercussions of unfavorable judgments.

Aunt MaryJane was engrossed in a conversation with my grandparents in the kitchen, their voices drifting toward me in fragmented snippets. Suddenly, a remark caught my attention. What was that? Had I heard it correctly? I had been shedding tears, longing for my father just yesterday? There was no physical barrier separating the dining room and the family room where I was sitting. Through the open doorway that connected the spaces, I caught glimpses of my aunt as she paced between the refrigerator and the stove. Her presence flickered, resembling a cautionary signal pulsating in my line of sight. Meanwhile, my grandparents maintained an air of quietude, seemingly attentive to my aunt’s words. However, their silence was broken when my grandfather rose from the table, his chair scraping against the kitchen’s vinyl floor, a distinctive sound that I had encountered before. My aunt and my grandmother followed suit, converging upon me. It became evident that I was the subject of their conversation, a realization I gleaned from discreet eavesdropping. With my aunt taking the lead, their steps suggested an impending intervention. Be it admonishment or perhaps even congratulations, I braced myself for what lay ahead. “Danny, why don’t you join us in prayer and invite Jesus into your heart?” My aunt’s words floated in the air, full of significance.

Reflecting on the past, I contemplated similar propositions that emerged in the Euclid church and persisted in the town of Phoenix. Adjacent to the church stood a smaller building known as the “parsonage,” which served as a dwelling for financially disadvantaged individuals, mostly younger men who were new members. They often made unabashed and even self-aggrandizing confessions, adhering to a creed that emphasized the more tumultuous one’s past, the more remarkable their transformation. Across the street, a fire station would occasionally become active with deafening sirens, seemingly aiming to provoke and interrupt the meetings. Four gatherings took place every week—Sunday mornings, Sunday evenings, and Wednesday and Friday nights. The dogma underwent continuous changes, but the expectations of conforming to what was deemed new and approved remained constant. Over time, speaking in tongues became less frequent and less spontaneous, and demonstrations of miracles all but vanished. The healing of backs with my father’s touch at a congregant’s feet was never witnessed again. Nevertheless, throughout it all, almost every sermon concluded with a call to the unsaved, an invitation to embrace Christ in their hearts.

During those days I didn’t fully grasp its meaning, and even now it remains elusive. I never bothered to ask about it, unlike simpler questions that received inadequate answers. “Just go with it” became my mentality. It was what was expected, what was done, akin to tradition. Ironically, tradition, as I later discovered, was a word used to describe practices that could obstruct necessary progress, often wielded as ammunition to criticize and attack other churches and denominations. In a peculiar turn of events, it eventually became a tradition for my father to deliver sermons from notes, which had once been considered taboo. I recall those sermons vividly, my father proclaiming, “The Lord isn’t confined to a script; his Spirit moves freely.” The congregation’s affirmation reverberated through exclamations of “Praise God! Yes, thank you, Jesus! Amen!”, followed by hymns of praise. I often imagined my father explaining such changes as a natural evolution toward spiritual maturity. The expression “babes in Christ” comes to mind, as if he would say, “We were young in Christ, in the days of Euclid.” Ah, those years brimming with insinuations and expectations to believe without questioning, where non-compliance carried consequences. I would have faced punishment if I had declared the truth of my uncertainty regarding these claims—matters of utmost significance that have been debated throughout history—an omnipotent force overseeing my eternal afterlife. Silence! Obey! Occasionally, a fellow brother or sister in the church would muster the courage to ask, “Why aren’t you waving your hands to God with praise like the others?” Doing my best to conceal my discomfort, I would act in a manner appropriate enough to maintain my façade. Within me, the phrase “You want answers, you want the truth? You can’t handle the truth,” uttered by Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men, encapsulates my frustration. Resentment swelled within me, fueled by the burden of hiding my true self from prying eyes. Amidst the torment, the only escape offered seemed to be a stark ultimatum: “Believe in Jesus, confess his lordship, and find salvation. Choose light or darkness, the definitive door.” It was presented as a stark dichotomy, an either/or proposition.

“What’s the issue? Just profess your faith in him. Why would you willingly choose damnation?” These words, uttered by my Uncle Joe one fateful Sunday, resounded within the walls of my grandparents’ house as my girlfriend, Susan, listened, unaware of the perceived disparities within her Catholic faith. Its practice of venerating statues, regarded as deviating from the essence of true Christianity, eluded her awareness. Her attempts at diplomacy and “fitting in” proved fruitless, for within the realm of my nuclear and extended family, conformity was the sole viable path, demanding compliance or at least pretense in the pursuit of harmony. Discussions that bridged divides and sought understanding, yearning for the mention of Pascal’s wager, remained elusive, an unattainable dream. It could have been an opportunity to delve into the chasm between lip service and genuine belief. Their resolute convictions, fortified by interpretations within the realm of fundamentalist Christianity, erected an impenetrable fortress against reason’s tender advances. Thus, I resorted to what was necessary, embracing remnants of truth while treading the treacherous path of measured deceit, preserving the thin disguise so vital to my existence. And so, amidst the clandestine shadows, witnessing Susan’s tears that day and shouldering the responsibility of consoling her, I walked silently alongside her, guiding her toward the solace of home.

As time passed, changes continued to develop in the dynamics and topics of discussion. The concept of family unity emerged as a recent subject triggered by discussions of the rapture and the impending end times. The belief that “God is coming back” and that the prophecies in Revelation are being fulfilled instilled a sense of urgency—there wasn’t much time left. The pulpit became a platform to address worldly corruption, crime, drugs, and similar issues, calling for a more pronounced public display of concern, as if the hoots and hollers from the pews were no longer sufficient. “I want all family members, parents, and children to come together, to stand in a circle and pray with me.” It was akin to the Living Word Super Bowl, where families gathered like players in a huddle. Instead of remaining in the pews with the other congregants, I was summoned to join my siblings and parents on the stage, in full view of everyone. We engaged in synchronized crying and wailing, putting our emotions on full display for passersby, nearby observers, and even those at the fire station who dared to peek through the large open doors. The spectacle involved theatrics of sobbing, posturing eyes, and quivering lips. Some would speak in unintelligible “tongues” with a somber tone, performing and observing from the sidelines. I, too, was expected to participate in this dramatic exhibition. My acting skills were pushed to their limits, stretching beyond what I was comfortable with. I couldn’t help but reminisce about the good old days when I could listen to episodes of CBS Radio Mystery Theatre using my crystal pen radio and hidden earpiece, finding solace and safety in the confines of my pew.

Crafting scenarios in my mind that could elicit even a single tear was a daunting task, but stepping onto that stage took the challenge to a whole new level. We huddled together like a team of athletes, arms intertwined, grunts and sweat connecting us. The surge of discomfort within me, triggered by these involuntary memories, was a direct result of years of pressure to conform and assimilate.

This visceral reaction was how I replied to my aunt’s request. I didn’t blame her but rather the proposition itself. Sometimes Aunt MaryJane and my grandparents defied the judgments that contributed to my isolation, displaying genuine care. At that moment, I contemplated the true meaning of having “God in my heart.” Perhaps they were onto something—a religion with versatile purposes, capable of good and ill. In that uncertain time, doubts plagued my beliefs and my sanity. But what did I have to lose?

“Alright, Aunt MaryJane,” I said. “I’ll pray with you and invite Jesus into my heart.” With her hand on my shoulder and the other raised, my aunt initiated the prayer, and my grandparents stood by our sides, joining in.

“Repeat after me, Danny. Dear Jesus, come into my life and cleanse away my sins. I acknowledge my past as a sinner and humbly seek your forgiveness . . .” I went through with it, reciting every word, hoping for a transformative experience. Their desire for my salvation was genuine, and I acknowledged it. Their intentions were pure, but the entire process felt awkward, reminiscent of a childhood revival meeting when I stood alongside countless others, earnestly praying and beckoning God to enter my life as the evangelist instructed. It felt awkward then, and the following day, I faced criticism in Sunday School for my approach.

“You didn’t even close your eyes while praying up there,” a classmate exclaimed. Close my eyes? No one had told me about that. I had assumed it would be easy to look around and emulate others. I thought something was wrong with me.

Now I questioned the expectations placed upon me. How was I supposed to act? I had spoken the prescribed words but felt no discernible change. Should I start leaping or attempt to speak in tongues? I knew I had the ability, just as others did. Their eyes fixed on me, waiting for my reaction. “I think I’ll retreat to the sofa and take a moment to relax, alright?” I said, creating yet another awkward moment to be recounted in the future. It seemed as if I might as well have been praying in a crowd with my eyes wide open, acutely aware of being watched and laughed at.

As time marched forward, blending each passing day into a collage of random events, I found solace in memories of simpler moments from years ago when our family stood united. In the dining room, we gathered together, Grandma playfully complaining about her salty tomato sauce while Grandpa strummed his mandolin, creating beautifully off-key melodies that filled the room with love and warmth. Oh, how I longed to recreate that scene, to make them see the reality before us.

“Danny, are you alright?” Aunt MaryJane’s sudden presence startled me. Where had she come from? How long had she been sitting beside me?

“Oh, hi, Aunt MaryJane, I’m back,” I replied, attempting to regain my composure.

“You’re back? Back from where? Where have you been?” she asked, concern evident in her voice. I couldn’t let her in on my secret; she wouldn’t understand. So, I sat there in silence, wondering how much she knew and for how long she had been aware of my predicament. Fortunately, she stood up and headed toward the kitchen, picking up the phone along the way. My mind raced with questions. Whom was she calling? Was it her husband, Gary? Would she divulge something about me? Perhaps he was the one who posed a threat, the one who might try to kill me.

The haunting chime of the doorbell pierced my deep reverie. Who could it be?

“Gary, I need to call you back. I think that’s Bob at the door,” Aunt MaryJane said into the phone. Bob? My father? What could bring him here? I had just been thinking about him earlier. Or had I been discussing him with Aunt MaryJane?

As my father and my brother, David, walked through the door, my heart began to race. David was no longer the timid sibling I remembered—the one who hid beneath our family’s station wagon as we dodged the fury of teenagers during our daring escapades. Instead, there was a new confidence in his stance, arms crossed, looking down at me with a challenging authority. He’s become so sure of himself, I thought, feeling the hairs on the back of my neck rise. Another shiver ran down my spine, adding to the heavy cache of secrets I bore.

It was time to summon my courage, to break the uneasy silence. “Here I am, your living proof,” I declared, surprising even myself with the audacity of my words.

“What?” my father replied, his voice slicing through the tension in the room. My mind drifted, delving into memories of my upbringing within the confines of religious teachings and my father’s parenting style. There was always a cadence to his speech, a deliberate manipulation of timing and tone to capture attention and emphasize selected words, aiming to maximize the impact of his messages. I anticipated a return to that familiar technique, and I yearned to disrupt the predictable orchestration, to dismantle the carefully constructed persona. Enough with the nonsensical detours down Looney Tunes alley. It was time to get to the point, to spit out the harsh truths that my father so readily embraced. This is what happens when you live in sin, when you turn away from the Lord, I thought, picturing him wanting to say those words, a combination of a grimace and an unwarranted smile playing on his lips. I had seen that look before, the twisted delight he displayed after exacting revenge. He reveled in it, using my downfall as ammunition for his self-assurance. Excuse me, but need I remind you that we are all losers here, a shattered family torn apart? No, I was just fuel for his confidence tank, and there it was, that “Okay, wise guy, I’ve got this” expression on his face.

I turned my gaze toward David, his arms still crossed over his chest. There was no trace of sympathy or dissent in his eyes, just a silent affirmation of agreement with our father’s words. He stood there brooding beside my father, as if daring me to challenge their beliefs. He had found solace in our father’s perceptions, accepting them as his own truth despite his firsthand experiences that contradicted such notions. It was as I remembered—when tragedy struck or floods engulfed us, David sought comfort within our father’s perspective, adopting the supposed facts and truths handed down. An interesting choice given that before his eyes stood a vehicle ready to transport him to higher, safer ground.

As I laid on the sofa, my mind wandered through the labyrinth of time, yearning to return to a simpler era when worries were scarce and the family was united. Memories of laughter in the dining room flooded my thoughts, moments of joy and connection that brought us together. If only I could transport those moments to the present, to help my family grasp the true nature of what was unfolding, the profound sense of loss and absence that saturated the atmosphere. The weight of their understanding would be a lifeline, offering solace and empathy. But as my father’s voice cut through the air, a sharp and accusatory tone, I braced myself for the all-too-familiar confrontation that awaited me.

“Danny, what drugs have you been taking?” The familiar pattern of simplifying complex dynamics into a self-serving narrative took shape. I could already anticipate the song-and-dance routine, the dismissal of intellectual discourse, and the reduction of everything to sin and drugs. “Not getting into a tangled sofa session here, no intellectual discourse about relationships and such from some psychiatrist trying to shift responsibility away from sinners. The boy’s lost his mind because he’s in sin, on drugs, and that’s all there is to it.”

Oh, please just go away!

“Join us.” The words resonated in my ears.

“David, did you say that?” I asked, my confusion intensifying.

“Did I say what? I didn’t say anything,” David replied. I turned to face him, searching for a clue that might support his denial. He stood there, undoubtedly present to support the impending onslaught of accusations, yet his imperious stance failed to mask his bewilderment. His expression revealed his cluelessness. But then the question lingered in the air: who spoke those words? Join who? Join what? Could it have been the whisper of the demon, insidiously extending its invitation?

David leaned in closer, his head inching toward mine. Suspense hung in the air as conclusions about me loomed on the horizon, but whose verdict would it be? With a calculated step back, he regained his authoritative posture, arms still folded across his chest. A sneer crept onto his face, displaying his disapproval of me and my current state, a spectacle for everyone in the room. With his own sense of style and rhythm, David turned to our father. “I don’t think he even knows who I am,” he said. “He’s really messed up.”

Suddenly, an imposing figure clad in black-and-white-striped attire emerged, an empire of judgment personified. With a swift motion, he extended his arm, clenched his fist, and pulled it back to his hip, proclaiming, “Strike!” The air crackled with tension as the figure’s commanding presence lingered, sending a chilling wave of unease and tremors down my spine. With a seamless transition, my father took the metaphorical mound, poised to deliver his pitch: “Danny, I asked you, what drugs have you taken?”

My retort was swift. “What? Who do you think you are?”

“I’m your father,” he replied with a hint of sarcasm.

Without uttering a word, I challenged him silently, my thoughts racing. Oh, really? Are you the same father I recently sought, leaving messages on chalkboards, notepads, and even office walls? Does anyone truly know who my father is? Against the backdrop of coffee breaks and office banter, my quest stood out, displayed in vibrant colors, injecting an intriguing twist into the routines of company employees. Among messages like “Puppy for Sale” and “$20 Secret Santa Cap,” my bold proclamation of “Who’s my daddy?” sparked an empire of curiosity, setting off a commotion that captured the attention of all. As I embarked on a two-week odyssey to unveil the truth about my father, conversations and interest soared, leaving no one untouched by the captivating and engaging intrigue, which interrupted the routine of business.

One particular incident unfolded during my persistent solicitation efforts with a man named Dick Shutt, a partner at an electronics company. Despite facing countless rejections, his secretary finally relented and granted me an audience, perhaps driven by sheer curiosity or to alleviate my persistent calls. As I made my pitch, Dick’s initial disinterest transformed into intrigue. “What did you say your name was?” he inquired, his eyes flickering with recognition.

“Dan Mazur, sir,” I replied.

“Are you by any chance related to Bob Mazur from Tri-Art Studios?”

“Yes, he’s my father, and that was his business.”

At that moment a spark of realization flashed across his face, and he excused himself, promising a swift return. Little did I know, it marked the beginning of a whirlwind of conversations and curiosity surrounding my father and his business style.

Dick reappeared accompanied by two individuals embroiled in an animated discussion. Their irritation at the interruption was palpable, urging a speedy resolution. With a backward motion of his thumb, Dick pointed toward me, uttering three words that solidified my presence in their minds: “That’s Mazur’s kid.” It wasn’t until later that I grasped the underlying intrigue that circulated among businessmen within the community, centered around my father’s ambitious transition from entrepreneur to pastor. The comments I overheard dispelled any notions of my father’s virtuous intentions, painting a picture of an aggressive go-getter and casting me, his offspring, as a subject of intensified scrutiny.

“Really, Dick? You’re claiming that’s Bob’s son?” one of them asked, amused by my presence as if I were an organ grinder’s monkey, entertaining them with my proclamations.

Despite this initial impression, Dick became my client, and over the course of several months, we developed a working relationship and established rapport. During this time, I sought his opinion on various matters. During one after-hours consultation when I sought his counsel regarding a particular issue, his response remains clear to this day: “You know what’s best, Dan. Follow your instincts.” This departure from my anticipated response left me flabbergasted, devoid of self-interest, ego, or the customary appeal to his authority. I approached many other people, including my parents and even individuals from church, with my question, hoping to discover a range of viewpoints. Everyone had an answer, presenting their perspectives with unwavering certainty, having me believe they were right. But not Dick. He left me contemplating the value of my own process of seeking answers. Could I trust my own judgment and intuition? It was a concept at odds with my upbringing, which revered accomplished individuals who purportedly knew better and dictated instructions.

“I know what’s best?” I mused, contemplating the profound implications of such a statement.

Dick’s behavior toward me exhibited a paternal quality, sparking the thought that he could potentially be my father. The possibility weighed on my mind, casting a shadow of confusion and intrigue over our interactions. Consequently, I became relentless in making phone calls and unexpected appearances, causing chaos and disruption to his business.

And now, amidst the complexities of it all, I found myself grappling with the absence of even the most basic understanding of my own paternity. My father’s identity and whereabouts remained elusive, waiting to be uncovered through a unique unraveling process. Yet in the presence of this elusive man before me, attempting to push me to my limits, I had a different plan in mind. Instead of succumbing to his scrutiny, I decided to turn the tables and test him instead.

Amidst the palpable tension that filled the room, I gathered my courage and broke the silence with a confident voice, presenting a captivating suggestion. “You know, I’m feeling a little hungry. How about we head to the kitchen and indulge in some fruit? Grandma, do you happen to have any fresh fruit?” My diversionary tactic took hold, shifting the focus and disrupting the rigid dynamics that had held sway. Confusion filled the room, but everyone seemed intrigued, ready to embark on this impromptu adventure.

We made our way to the kitchen, anticipation filling the air. Grandma retrieved a couple of bowls, placing them on the table before us. With a flourish, she opened a can of pineapple, pouring its golden sweetness into the awaiting bowls.

“Do you know about the companies that make this fruit?” I inquired, a mischievous glint in my eye.

“Yeah, I do,” my father replied cautiously. With a triumphant smile, I presented the fruit before him.

“Well, here it is—the fruit from the very companies you claim to know. Take the first bite, then I’ll have some too.”

He hesitated, a hint of resistance in his voice. “No, let someone else have it.”

“But it’s just fruit,” I pushed back, determined to challenge his reluctance, “fruit from the places you claim to know.”

His resolve hardened. “No, I won’t eat any. Let someone else have it.” The tension lingered in the air as our eyes locked, a battle of wills unfolding over simple pieces of fruit.

In that pivotal moment, the room held its breath, captivated by the clash of wills. As the standoff continued, a sense of anticipation filled the air, leaving me wondering what secrets lurked beneath the surface. Would this culinary confrontation unravel the tangled web of our relationship and offer insights into the mysteries of my paternity? The answer hung in the balance, poised on the precipice of this seemingly simple act of defiance.

As the room was engulfed in escalating drama, the wail of sirens pierced the air, adding an eerie undertone and intensifying the palpable tension. The disruptive cacophony resonated in harmony with the turmoil stirring inside me.

At that critical moment, following a knock on the door and my aunt’s departure from the kitchen to meet those outside, paramedics appeared before me. Their hands reached out, their touch a blend of urgency and clinical detachment. It was a jolting reminder that I was about to be wrenched away from my loved ones again, pushed into a realm of unpredictability and unfamiliarity. Their presence became a disorienting transition, propelling me into yet another journey into the unknown.

While descending the hallway steps under the paramedics’ firm grasp, I stole a fleeting glance back over my shoulder. There stood my grandfather, his face etched with a mixture of deep concern and profound sorrow. His eyes spoke volumes, conveying a silent plea for me to remain, to find solace within the shelter of our shared love. But circumstances demanded otherwise, and I had to continue forward.

In that turbulent, confusing moment, as I was being led away, my grandfather’s words resonated in the depths of my soul: “Oh, Lord, whatever burdens my grandson carries, place them upon me instead.” This profound testament to his unconditional love and unwavering commitment penetrated my being, reminding me of the boundless depth of his love and his readiness to shoulder my burdens and shield me from harm.

Continue to chapter 2 →

Chapter 2

On to Miami

Chapter menu ↑

It was March 17, 1994, seven years later. I was settled on the sofa in my new apartment, gazing through the sliding glass doors at the view outside at 7215 NW 179th Street in Hialeah, Florida. Gone were the familiar oak trees of Syracuse, replaced by palm trees that lined the nondescript east-west street.

Navigating this unfamiliar territory, I was adapting to the unique aspects of travel and daily life there. While I went by the name Dan Mazur, uncertainties about my identity persisted. Born on September 24, 1961, at Saint Joseph’s Hospital in Syracuse, New York, I found myself, at age of thirty-two, anticipating that this day would not hold a favored place in my memory. Self-doubt had been a recurring presence, although it was not as unsettling as it once was.

I often questioned the reality of my existence and pondered the validity of my perceptions. In moments of doubt, I grappled with whether to trust my self-assessment or seek others’ viewpoints. I’d been labeled in various ways: major depression, dysthymia, bipolar disorder, and even with unconventional terms like “God hater” or “demon possessed.” However, I was left to wonder if identifying with any of these labels would bring clarity or cloud my self-understanding even further.

As I delved into a drawer that housed some important papers, a wave of nostalgia and intrigue swept over me. The documents now lay before me, capturing my attention, and it all started with stumbling upon my birth certificate. It was fascinating how something as simple as a piece of paper could hold such certainty about one’s existence. My name, place of birth, and age written on its surface alongside the official seal of the commissioner of health and three distinctive signatures. These undeniable facts about my identity should have brought me assurance seeing as, not too long ago, I found myself uncertain of even the most basic aspects of who I was. As I held the certificate in my hands, I realized how much I valued its tangible representation of my identity, and I resolved never to lose sight of it again.

On another Thursday morning in my modest one-bedroom apartment, the clock marked 11:00. It was an unusual hour for me to write, but those weren’t ordinary days. I lived alone in that space. While I once held a deep affection for it, the apartment evoked fewer pleasant memories after I moved in.

Across from me, my desk stood against the sliding glass door that revealed snippets of the outside world. If I were to paint a picture of my apartment, honesty would compel me to express its slightly disheveled state. In one word, it was a mess! Perhaps it reflected the way I’d been feeling lately—this melancholy that I described as an adjective rather than a diagnosis. It was not my first dance with depression, and I was keenly aware it could not be my last. These emotional spells arrived in two distinct flavors, much like comparing a cup of Syracuse coffee to the boldness of the Cuban coffee I now savored. Some were mild, fleeting visitors that often graced me with their presence. Others were more potent, infrequent guests that lingered far longer. Through it all, I remained optimistic, clinging to the belief that every experience, no matter how challenging, carried the potential for growth and resilience. Could something good truly emerge from the depths of despair? I mulled this question, all the while yearning for the brighter moments to overshadow the ones that caused even the simplest tasks, like tidying up, to slip through my fingers. If only you could have witnessed the state of my desk, adorned with a chaotic mixture of papers and remnants of food—like a partially eaten apple perched at its edge. Disgusting? Hardly. The true repugnance was in the untold details of other objects scattered before me. Amidst it all, I found solace in my ability to ramble on, even in the midst of my despondency. I’d learned that it was vital to find humor within myself, a sliver of sunshine to brighten the darkest of days. Yes, I had to seek out that small glimmer of light, even if it meant risking a sunburn from basking in its warmth without protection.

I was immersed in my Thursday morning typing session, I couldn’t help but wonder what lay hidden beneath the surface of my life. A quest for understanding, a search for meaning propelled my fingers across the keyboard with an almost magnetic force. The need to unravel the intricacies of my existence led me there, to piece together the fragments and memories that formed my being. Perhaps I’d meander through these thoughts, allowing my mind to wander freely, embracing the unexpected twists and turns that revealed themselves along the way.

A curious observation sprang to mind: why was it that whenever I was faced with adversity or pressure, I felt compelled to take immediate action? My financial situation was a good example. Whenever I felt the pinch of monetary needs, instinct kicked in, urging me to invest more time and work with heightened diligence. It was as if I was caught in a perpetual dance, where temporary relief faded all too quickly. But how much of my present state of despondency could be attributed to finances alone? Life demanded more than just fiscal stability; it craved a symphony of deeper connections and profound joys. Yet when fixated on financial needs, I unknowingly neglected the other facets of a fulfilling existence. I had noticed this pattern in others as well—their passions and joys overshadowed by the relentless pursuit of monetary gain. It was a delicate balance, one that often trapped me within the confines of a circular predicament. The pressures of work and the burdens of stress drained the life from my veins, casting a shadow over the vibrant colors that once painted my world.

How I yearned for a mystical button, capable of whisking me away to a simpler time—those innocent days of childhood when worries were but fleeting whispers. I remember climbing trees, embarking on thrilling hikes, swimming through lakes of bliss, and pedaling my bike, the wind whispering secrets in my ears. Back then there was no room for disappointment or disillusionment. The world was my canvas, and I painted it with unbridled joy. Some might have argued that I could still partake in these activities, reclaiming those fragments of happiness, but would it be the same? Could I find solace in these endeavors while the weight of concerns and pressures looms overhead? The enchantment of those carefree days seemed to fade when confronted with the complexities of the present, but the allure remained, beckoning me to seek moments of unadulterated bliss once more.

Chess, that age-old game of strategy and intellect, held a special place in my heart. From a young age, it enthralled me, satisfying my craving for intellectual challenge and competition. Whether I was engrossed in a game, a lively conversation, or an intense sports match, anything that engaged my mind and kindled a competitive spirit commanded my attention. Chess was my proving ground, a place where I sharpened my skills through successes and failures, absorbing the kind of wisdom that only experience can bestow. Traditional classroom teachings seemed tepid against the fiery passion of real-life contests. With every move, I matured as a player, driven by the quest for victory and the warm embrace of success. In victory, I reveled in the process, savoring the journey that led to that triumphant moment. Chess, with all its layers, became a reflection of life’s complexities. Competition, a thread that weaves through the fabric of existence, permeates our endeavors—be it in business, relationships, sports, or the game of life itself. Yet there existed stark disparities that set chess apart from the convolutions of reality. In chess the rules are crystal clear. Each piece moves with calculated precision, restricted only by its defined abilities. Life, however, dances to a different melody, its notes shrouded in ambiguity. For years I deluded myself into believing I could grasp the essence of others—know their intentions, desires, and capabilities. But how often had I been mistaken? How often had my trust been shattered by those I believed to be honorable? This begged the question: was I right in my judgment? Had these individuals truly descended from good to evil, or had my perceptions been clouded from the start? Despite the complexity of human nature, I lived by a few steadfast principles, resilient to the whims of my ignorance. The golden rule, to treat others as I want to be treated, served as my guiding light. But all too often, I stumbled in my attempts to navigate this intricate web of sincerity and deception. Who was genuine, and who was hiding behind a cloak of deception, seeking to exploit my vulnerabilities? What were the unspoken rules that governed these interactions? Was there a guidebook that I’d missed? Even if I possessed all the answers, what about the rest? Knowing someone’s insincerity or intent to take advantage allowed me to safeguard myself, to steer clear of treacherous waters. But could the wicked transform into the virtuous? Could people truly change their stripes? I was yearning for answers, for a flicker of certainty within the enigma of human nature. In my quest for understanding, I sought a set of guiding principles untainted by my ignorance, rules that would guide me through life’s labyrinth, enabling me to be the person I aspired to be.

Throughout my life, the dream of owning my own business had burned within me, an unwavering desire to create a space where I could manifest myself, infused with my beliefs and values. But amidst this yearning, a question lingered in the depths of my mind: could I find others who shared this fervor? And if our paths crossed, how would I recognize them? Were there distinctive qualities, unmistakable traits that distinguished the virtuous from the deceitful and the wicked? Or could darkness masquerade as light, casting an illusory glow upon the unwary?

I had stumbled upon a few guiding principles that assisted me in maneuvering through the convoluted puzzle of human nature, principles untarnished by the lingering mysteries of others. One such rule was to pay closer attention to what people did rather than what they said. Words and actions held significance, but the divide between them unveiled the naked truth—the lies concealed within the gaps. This keen observation had revealed deeper insights into the impartiality with which individuals treated others. A person’s true character was revealed in their consistency, in how they treated friends and foes alike. It was a fact that those who were dishonest and deceitful would do well not to discover, for when they claimed they’d take advantage of others but never me, it was merely a matter of time before their true intentions came to light. Indeed, I had embraced a handful of rules that provided a semblance of protection, but I still bore the scars of being burned.

And what about honesty? I had often professed to friends that everyone lies—it is an inherent part of our humanity. To abstain from lying required immense energy and unwavering attention. Besides, some lies are deemed acceptable, such as expressing enjoyment over a terrible meal lovingly cooked by a friend. Why do we associate our feelings with truth and lies? Hasn’t the meaning of the word “lie” been tainted by the creation of terms like “white lies,” meant to shield our emotions? Among the countless words in the English language, this should have been one of the simplest to grasp. A lie, as most understand it, is a deliberate falsehood. However, we have allowed our emotions to twist its meaning, branding lies as something inherently negative. Thus, people take offense when they are labeled as liars, vehemently denying any association with deceit. I maintained that we were all liars in some capacity—we needed to lie, and we would always lie. The crux of the matter was what we chose to lie about. Though it was never my goal to eliminate lying from my life entirely, I strove to reduce its occurrence with each passing year. And yet I wondered, was this quest for utmost honesty a mistake? Did it burden me with unrealistic expectations, demanding more than I was capable of giving? Had it created a sense of entitlement, expecting others to offer more than they were able?

As I continued my journey, seeking the delicate balance between truth and deception, I found myself navigating a sea of complexities. The path to understanding others and unraveling the mysteries of human nature might never be completely illuminated, but I pressed on, seeking to uncover the truths hidden beneath the surface.

Continue to chapter 3 →

Chapter 3

The Story of the Salesman

Chapter menu ↑

Amidst the vibrant rhythm of a busy day, I stepped into the Office Depot, a store filled with activity. It stood on a bustling street in Miami, surrounded by palm trees swaying in the gentle breeze. The urgency of my mission propelled me forward, feeling the relentless passage of time slipping through my fingers like grains of sand. As I entered the store, a mixture of hope and uncertainty filled my thoughts. Would I find the much-needed assistance amidst the wide array of products lining the shelves?

With anticipation shimmering in my eyes, I scanned the store, searching for a guiding presence among the aisles. The crowd hummed with energy, but my attention was captured by a salesman engrossed in conversation with another customer. Doubts crept in as I observed his divided attention, leaving me unsure if he would listen when it was my turn.

I waited for their conversation to conclude, then I approached the salesman, whose name tag identified him as Jose. With unwavering determination, I introduced myself and explained my quest for a line-sharing device capable of seamlessly integrating fax, computer, and phone calls. A subtle unease tugged at my senses as I spoke, sensing that Jose’s focus might not be fully directed toward my request.

Despite Jose’s polite response, my growing apprehension remained unassuaged. “No problem,” he assured me, his voice carrying a hint of distraction. “Wait here. I’ll be right back.” With those words, he vanished into the depths of the store, leaving behind a trail of lingering doubts about whether he truly understood my needs.

As minutes slipped by, time became a precious commodity in my pursuit. Finally, Jose emerged from the aisles, a box in his hands. Holding my breath, I accepted the package, searching his face for a glimmer of reassurance. “Are you absolutely certain this part fulfills the requirements I mentioned?” I asked. Jose’s reply remained resolute, reflecting the same assurance. Though uncertainty lingered, I contemplated the validity of my doubt and weighed the possibility that Jose’s words held genuine truth. Guided by that flicker of hope, I decided to place my trust in Jose, completing the purchase and departing the store, ready to face the next chapter of my day.

As I drove home, a wave of curiosity consumed me, intensifying my thoughts about my suspicions regarding Jose. As soon as I entered my apartment, I put the device to the test. Alas, the device proved inadequate, failing to establish the promised connection with my computer.

Five days passed before I mustered the determination to return to the store, not due to a demanding schedule but instead to allow myself time to cool down from my mounting frustration. I recognized the fallibility of human nature, acknowledging that distractions and mistakes can happen to anyone, me included. However, when I sense an impending error, I like to believe I possess the ability to take corrective action.

I was filled with regret for not addressing my suspicions during my initial visit to the store. Had Jose been motivated solely by a desire to expedite my departure that day? Was he inattentive or perhaps even dishonest, prioritizing his own convenience over my needs? I had meticulously explained my requirements, and he had reassured me of his understanding and possession of the correct part. Now my focus extended beyond obtaining the right component. I longed for an acknowledgment of his lack of attentiveness and, perhaps even an apology.

“Do you remember me?” I asked as I approached Jose. His response was lackluster, an unconvincing mumble. I pressed on. “I’m the person you sold the computer part to last week.”

“Oh yeah, how are you?” he replied, betrayed no inkling of awareness. It was time to confront him head-on.

“I find myself in a rather precarious situation. You sold me the incorrect part.” As I uttered those words, I detected a subtle shift in Jose’s expression. Taking deliberate steps toward me, he distanced himself from the shelves of printers that served as an inadvertent backdrop. It was as if a transformation was underway, revealing his true character.

“Okay, well, don’t worry,” Jose replied. “Just tell me what’s wrong, and I’ll help you.” His words aimed to divert the focus away from any potential responsibility on his part. Unyielding in my resolve, I pressed forward, directing our attention to the item he had provided.

“Let’s start with this part you sold me,” I said, my tone resolute. Jose’s bemused expression flickered with a hint of uncertainty, a telltale sign that he was struggling to grasp the weight I placed on the word “start.” Nevertheless, I had captured his undivided attention, a stark contrast to our initial encounter.

“It falls short of communicating with my computer, yet you assured me it would fulfill all my needs.”

“No, I’m sure it does exactly what I said,” Jose insisted, unwavering in his stance. However, armed with the knowledge gleaned from thorough perusal of the instructions, I retrieved the manual and handed it to him. Then I directed Jose’s attention to the four words I had highlighted in bold crimson: “Doesn’t work with computers.” My intention was to elicit a voluntary confession, hoping to witness a transformative shift in Jose’s countenance and foster an authentic connection to the reality of our situation. However, as I gazed at him, a sinking feeling settled in, signaling that my hopes would remain unfulfilled. Despite my evolution away from coercion and force, I realized there was nothing left for me to do.

As I stood there confronting Jose, the air was charged with anticipation. A hushed murmur enveloped the surrounding space as other customers, intrigued by the unfolding exchange, listened in. As their eyes darted back and forth between Jose and me, I couldn’t help but wonder what judgments they were passing. Did they view me as an unreasonable troublemaker, stirring up a storm over nothing?

With practiced ease, Jose attempted once again to defuse the situation. His words carried a hint of dismissal, downplaying the gravity of the matter. “Of course, I know this part well. It recognizes phone calls and fax calls. What I said was that it doesn’t support computer calls. You must have misunderstood me. However, I do have the correct part and can do an exchange for you.” As expected, no apology was forthcoming, and Jose stood firm, denying any wrongdoing.

Our conversation had reached an impasse, rendering further discussion fruitless. In the ensuing silence, only the necessary arrangements for the exchange remained. As I glanced around the store, a potent blend of disappointment and a burning sense of injustice weighed upon me. With the poise and determination of a protagonist exiting a pivotal scene, I turned on my heel and strode out the door, George Thorogood’s “One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer” resonating in my mind like a captivating soundtrack. Its words and wisdom amplified my resolve as I embraced the melody leading to the climactic chorus of “and out the door I went.” It was a resolute step forward, propelling me into the abyss of the unknown, prepared to face the next seemingly insurmountable challenge that lay ahead.

Just as I was about to reach the comfort of my car, a familiar figure approached, capturing my attention. It was a silent witness, one of the customers who had witnessed my confrontation with Jose. Eager to establish a connection, he commenced weaving his own tale, convinced that our stories were kindred spirits intertwining in the cosmic lattice of fate.

Intrigued, I listened attentively, my senses attuned. However, with each passing word, it became apparent that our journeys diverged into separate realms. His satisfaction stemmed from relishing in the humiliation of an employee, reveling in the perverse joy of dominance. It was a narrative alien to my reality, an incongruous tangent on the quest for truth and justice. Was it worth attempting to explain, to bridge the gap between our experiences, given the limited time we had in the parking lot? Would the man even care to know my thoughts? The weariness of unproductive encounters weighed on my spirit, and at that moment, I made a decision. I climbed into my car, the engine purring to life, and drove home.

Continue to chapter 4 →

Chapter 4

A Look Further Back

Chapter menu ↑

Many people believe that our past experiences mold our present selves. Undoubtedly, there’s some truth in this perspective. But what about my parents? How much of their history has influenced me, shaping who I am today? Surely, there’s value in delving into the chronicles of the past and viewing life through the lens of retrospection. Thus, I embarked on this introspective journey not solely to unravel the mysteries of my own past but also to comprehend the complex system of human behavior that defines others. I sought to unearth how every strand of history had entwined itself into the fabric of my being, shaping who I am today. And so, I shall continue this odyssey with recollections of my father, awakening the latent recollections that reside within.

Once again, my eyes are drawn to my birth certificate, particularly to item #27: Father of Child. It reads “Robert James Mazur, White, 24 years of age, Born in New Jersey.” My knowledge of my father’s early years is limited, consisting mainly of snippets he’s shared with us. I’m aware that his mother was of Polish descent while his Italian father remained an enigma throughout his life. In his quest to understand his past, my father unearthed the painful reality of his own father’s tragic end. Only two other facets of his father’s life stand out: he struggled with the shackles of alcoholism, and he was unmarried when my father was conceived.

When my father was an infant, his mother remarried, embracing the union with a Polish man, and their family flourished over the passing years, growing to seven. With his darker features, my father stood apart from his siblings, who had a lighter complexion and a distinct hue of hair. Longing to unravel the enigma of my father’s life, I once approached his brother, my Uncle Frankie, hoping to initiate a conversation. I distinctly recall that day, within the sanctuary of our Liverpool home, as we passed through a sliding glass door and found ourselves nestled behind its walls, creating an intimate haven of seclusion. After a delightful family outing, the act of crossing that threshold bestowed upon us a cherished gift of seclusion and privacy where our voices could be heard in hushed tones and our thoughts could be shared without interruption. At the tender age of thirteen, my mind was brimming with curiosity, and I couldn’t resist posing the question that had haunted my thoughts: “What are your thoughts on Dad being your half-brother?” I inquired, hoping to illuminate the stories that had captivated me and fueled my contemplation, yearning to uncover the truth about his secretive past.

Uncle Frankie’s response was swift, shattering my assumptions. “What do you mean? Your father isn’t my half-brother,” he retorted. Years of tales had woven a complex story of conflicting narratives about Dad’s family, leaving me uncertain about what to believe about the essence of his past. Eager for more clarity, I pressed further.

“Come on, Frankie, you and Dad look nothing alike. You know you have different fathers. Why are you deceiving me?”

“No, Danny, your dad is my true brother,” he insisted, hoping to quell my doubts.

A whirlwind of thoughts ensued within me, grappling with the weight of Uncle Frankie’s words. His true brother? What did he mean by that? Was he playing games with semantics? Was he implying a bond beyond biology alone? Uncertainty engulfed my mind as I strived to unravel the intricate threads of our family’s tangled history.

Eventually, our conversation veered back to reminiscing about a day of bass fishing at my grandparents’ camp. However, my curiosity remained fixated on uncovering more about my uncle’s relationship with my father.

Just as I was about to broach the topic again, my mother entered, announcing that dinner was ready. We retreated indoors and shared a meal, after which the adults retired to the living room. As for me, I retreated to the pantry, finding a discreet spot just outside their view, where I could eavesdrop on their conversation. The exchange began with casual banter, but it wasn’t long before I heard my uncle pose the question that had consumed my thoughts: “Danny mentioned that I might be your half-brother. What do you think about that?”

Silence fell upon them, a departure from the customary swift response that typically followed inquiries. Then my father’s voice chimed in, deflecting the topic with an unrelated remark. I can’t recall his exact words, only that he shifted the conversation away from Frankie’s query. To this day I remain uncertain about what to believe, caught up in a maelstrom of unknowns.

Dark whispers of terrible deeds loomed over my father’s identity. I was told that his mother concealed his existence from family and friends, shielding him behind locked doors because he was considered her illegitimate son. Poverty, too, was said to cast a dark shadow, subjecting my father to wretched living conditions and nights spent on a bed covered with nothing but newspapers as makeshift blankets. The image my father painted of his past was one of hardship and struggle.

During his high school years, it is said that my father endured a harrowing incident, pushed down a flight of concrete steps. This traumatic event led to an injury that was subsequently proclaimed to be miraculously healed through divine intervention. While this narrative was shared with me and others as a testament to embrace, I was captivated by the underlying causes behind such an occurrence, yearning to understand the root of the conflicts he encountered with his classmates.

Throughout his hospitalization, as he recovered from his injuries, my father shared accounts of profoundly haunting experiences. He spoke of finding himself amidst cadavers, their presence remaining undetected by the hospital staff for hours while he lay trapped within a body cast that rendered him completely immobile, unable to move his limbs. This harrowing narrative has become an integral part of the structure of our family’s history, recounted on countless occasions, brimming with vivid depictions of the unsettling sounds of the dying and the disconcerting hisses and squeaks of rodents within the rat-infested room. It was within this crucible of adversity that my father declared himself a graduate from the school of hard knocks, the indomitable spirit within him forever marked by an enduring imprint.

While residing in Liverpool, I suffered a ligament tear in my knee during a winter skiing excursion at Labrador Mountain. As a consequence, my leg was encased in a plaster cast that extended from hip to toe for a grueling six-week period. When the doctor finally removed the cast, I was confronted with the sight of my scrawny, feeble, and odorous leg. It became immediately apparent that reclaiming its strength and simply being able to walk again would require weeks of dedicated therapy. As I contemplated the challenges of my recovery, I could only imagine the arduous process of recuperating from months spent encased in a full-body cast.

Residing on the enchanting circle of Black Oak Drive in Liverpool, a medley of memories unfurled, interweaving turbulent recollections and tranquil moments. This tableau captured the vivid remembrances of being labeled as a preacher’s kid, faltering in the face of attacks and prejudice, and succumbing to moments of cowardice born out of youthful inexperience. Amidst these trials, I also embraced the cherished days of carefree bliss, where laughter filled the air as we engaged in leisurely baseball matches around the revered pinewood telephone pole that symbolized our cherished home base.

In our abode within Clairmont Park, cameras were a constant presence, reflecting my father’s passion for photography in his personal and professional endeavors. The photographs that adorned our family room end table held countless memories, inviting me to piece them together like intricate jigsaw puzzles, seeking the perfect fit between the snapshots and my own recollections. Among these snapshots, the black-and-white images from earlier years served as evidence that my father had indeed relied on a cane long ago, as the story goes. The doctors had predicted he would require it until the inevitable day when walking became an insurmountable challenge. Yet in my recollections, he engaged in exercise and physical endeavors without any visible struggle. If those same doctors had witnessed his mobility later in life, how would they have reacted? Would they have deemed it a miraculous transformation? And what about the collection of canes and crutches displayed within the Phoenix church, proudly showcased upon the pulpit for all to see? What would the doctors have to say about that?

After being released from the hospital, my father embarked on a new chapter in New Jersey, working as an apprentice in an art studio. It was there that he honed his skills and gained invaluable on-the-job training, accumulating life experience along the way. Eventually, our family moved to New York, where my father realized his dream of opening his own studio. It was known as Tri Art Studios, a name that I heard ambitious businessmen refer to when I was embarking on my own entrepreneurial journey.

In the photo albums, I stumbled upon images of a peculiar orange building, triggering memories of our earlier years in Bridgeport before our family made Liverpool our new home. Back then, at age ten, I had no inkling of the changes that awaited me, nor did I realize that the seemingly ordinary moments of everyday life were on the brink of a significant transformation. It was a time when our perspectives would shift, and the world around us would take on new meaning.

Gone were the days of carefree conversations and the cherished bonds of neighborly kinship when my mother would dispatch me to the Hoffmans’ residence next door with the humble task of borrowing a pat of butter. The era of effortless communication and genuine camaraderie appeared to be slipping away, fading into the recesses of memory. Our once-cherished connection with the broader community became constricted and confined. We found ourselves retreating into a realm of exclusive camaraderie, seeking refuge and kinship solely among those who shared our beliefs—our brothers and sisters in Christ. It was a perplexing time, as these transformative experiences reshaped the lens through which I viewed the snapshots within the albums. Even the image of my youthful self, beaming with pride in my Cub Scouts uniform at Morgan Road Elementary, carried a nuanced weight, stirring reflections on the shifting landscape of our existence.

During that pivotal period, I eagerly attended regular Cub Scouts meetings at my dear friend Steve Dupe’s house. His mother, a warm and dedicated figure, served as our den mother, nurturing our scouting journey with unwavering support and guidance. It was within the welcoming walls of their home that our Scouts gatherings unfolded, brimming with excitement and anticipation. I recall the exhilarating moment when our den mother unveiled the captivating project that would fuel our youthful imaginations: building cars for the upcoming Pinewood Derby, an exhilarating miniature car race to be held at my school the following month. The air buzzed with energy as we embraced the opportunity to shape our own racing marvels, each car an expression of our creativity and determination.

Filled with enthusiasm, I returned home after the meeting, excited to share the news with my father and embark on this special project together. However, my excitement quickly turned to disappointment when he replied, “Not tonight. I’m too busy.” Undeterred, I continued to ask him in the days and weeks that followed, hoping for his involvement. Unfortunately, he always had an excuse, claiming to be too busy to assist me. Time slipped away, and while my friends proudly showcased their completed cars at the Scouts meetings, mine remained untouched, a constant reminder of my father’s unavailability.

In an attempt to hide my disappointment, I would make excuses when asked about my progress, telling my friends that my car still needed work. Deep down I carried the weight of unfulfilled expectations, yearning for the guidance and support that I had hoped to receive from my father.

As race day drew nearer, I was in a state of desperation. I couldn’t bear the thought of attending the event empty handed, watching my friends’ cars zoom down the track while mine sat unfinished. Seeking a solution, I turned to my mom and shared my frustration about my father’s lack of assistance. To my surprise, she took action. “Come with me,” she said, her voice filled with determination.

Soon after, my excitement brimming, I descended to the basement alongside my father, clutching the car kit in my hands. With eager anticipation, I dumped the parts onto the workbench, the room filled with the intoxicating aroma of sawdust, a testament to the countless woodworking masterpieces my father had brought to life. The images from magazines that once adorned the pages were now transformed into tangible, awe-inspiring creations.

My father’s discerning eyes locked onto the block of pinewood, leaving the other parts behind as he beckoned me to join him in the woodshop. With a pointing finger, he directed me to a sturdy stool, then positioned the block on the lathe, which sprang to life, spinning rapidly. With astonishing skill and unwavering precision, my father wielded an array of tools, shaping the lifeless block into a sleek and elegant racing body. The transformation was nothing short of magical, a testament to his craftsmanship. The air filled with the mesmerizing melody of sandpaper, resonating as my father’s steady hand smoothed every rough edge. In awe, I watched as he applied the finishing touches, painting my name in vibrant hues across both sides of the car. The colors burst forth, infusing the vehicle with a unique identity, a vivid reflection of my own spirit.

Yet beneath the surface of this newfound beauty, a lingering sense of emptiness tugged at my heart. While my father toiled tirelessly, I had merely played the role of an observer, reading instructions aloud and offering suggestions that fell on deaf ears. My concerns and desires for a true partnership in the project were met with a dismissive wave. “Son, everything is done. The car is finished,” my father declared, oblivious to the yearning within me. It was a bittersweet moment, a blend of frustration and resignation. I longed for more than just a finished car; I yearned for a genuine connection and the opportunity to learn and create alongside my father.

During those days, my sister, Debbie, and I lived under the constant shadow of punishment, perpetually aware of the looming threat of “the belt” that awaited us each week. We would giggle nervously about it, exchanging whispered jokes like “smell it” as if to alleviate the mounting tension. However, beneath the surface, the fear of its frequent occurrence remained ever present. I would scramble up the stairs, my father’s belt swinging ominously, ready to strike me through the meager protection of my thin bed covers. But what right did I have to complain?

“You kids have it easy. Other parents use the buckle end of the belt!” my father would say. No blood was shed, and no bones were broken, but worse was the absence of my father’s presence and companionship.

“Danny, why don’t you go down to the basement and help your father in the woodshop? He’d really like that,” my mother would suggest. Did she not realize the anger that would erupt, leading him to strike me? Still, I would ponder her words, yearning to please her. I made attempts to assist my father in the basement, but my presence there never endured for long.

“Stupid! I asked for a grade-four sandpaper, not a two. Give me a screwdriver, not a wrench.. . . Can’t you find the quarter-inch socket wrench? You better find it if you know what’s good for you.. . . You stinking kids are always meddling with my tools.. . . That’s it, I’m getting the belt.”

Another Saturday dawned, heralding another eagerly anticipated Cub Scouts meeting where I could proudly unveil my car to my friends. As they caught sight of it, their voices filled the room with exclamations of awe and amazement. “Wow, look at Danny’s car!” they exclaimed. Curiosity sparked in their eyes as they questioned whether I had crafted it alongside my father. Their words carried a touch of disbelief, as if my creation belonged within the glossy pages of a magazine. The air crackled with excitement as everyone shared their thoughts, their voices swirling around the room. However, amidst the chorus of accolades, one voice remained notably absent—the gentle encouragement of my den mother, Mrs. Dupe. Though I couldn’t comprehend the reason behind her silence, her praise soon followed, adding to the enchantment of the moment. The attention lavished upon me, coupled with my friends’ admiration and amazement, created a euphoric atmosphere that filled my heart with exhilaration.

On the following Saturday, the air was filled with anticipation as my family and I embarked on a journey in our trusty station wagon. Our destination: Morgan Road Elementary School, where the much-awaited derby awaited us. With each step through the crowded hallways, my excitement grew. Finally, we entered the gymnasium, and there it stood—the race ramp, proudly commanding center stage. Surrounding it, tables adorned with name cards beckoned us to take our places. Amidst the bustling scene, my mother handed me a bowl of her homemade potato salad and directed me to carry it to a nearby table where an array of delectable treats awaited. As the room filled with families, a feeling of anticipation settled over us.

Suddenly, an announcement resonated through the space, signaling that it was time to find our seats and settle down. The room hushed as a speech began, and my fellow Scouts and I embarked on a culinary adventure, scanning the table of food for the most mouthwatering morsels. Then we eagerly awaited the conclusion of the formalities and the beginning of the race.

Finally, the moment we had all been waiting for arrived. With a burst of enthusiasm, we rose from our seats and made our way toward the ramp. Standing tall at the top, a man dressed in the esteemed regalia of scouting, adorned with badges and patches, commanded our attention. With unwavering precision, he recited the sacred rules of the competition, his words resonating throughout the room. Meanwhile, another man selected four cars for the opening race. The tension mounted as the Scouts, their proud dens, and their supportive parents were acknowledged one by one. The countdown began, reaching its climax as the bar holding the cars in place was raised. A thunderous “Go!” reverberated through the gymnasium, accompanied by a playful squeal from the mischievous speaker system, seemingly unable to contain its excitement. The race was on.

Pedal to the metal, or rather, wheels to the wood, our meticulously crafted cars hurtled down the track, propelled solely by gravity. The seconds ticked by in a blur of exhilaration and suspense. Within the blink of an eye, a winner emerged from the frenzy, their victory announced with a chorus of applause that filled the gymnasium. The cycle continued, race after race, for a captivating thirty minutes, as the room pulsated with a symphony of cheers and gasps. And then finally, it was my turn.

“Oh great,” I muttered as I witnessed my car being elevated high above the others, thrust into the radiant spotlight for all to marvel at. Its grand unveiling reverberated through the room, inducing a profound silence that seemed to be in a state of suspension, as if the air itself brimmed with heightened expectations. With a sweeping gaze, I surveyed the crowd, their eyes fixated upon me, the air thick with anticipation and electric energy. The clapping commenced, a rhythmic cadence that swelled in intensity, signaling a moment of triumph and an opportunity to shine. However, amidst the sea of applause, a tidal wave of unease crashed over me, causing me to shrink down in my seat, consumed by a sense of inadequacy. When the commanding call of “Go!” pierced the air, I closed my eyes, seeking relief in silent hopes for a fortuitous outcome.

The room fell silent. Confusion clouded my mind as I registered the absence of applause. The sudden stillness seemed to stretch on and on. Where was the missing proclamation of victory?

With a heavy sigh, I summoned the courage to open my eyes, bracing myself for the truth that awaited me. And there it was, a sight that struck at the core of my hopes and dashed them against the unforgiving reality. My car, trapped in a daunting limbo, remained suspended, halted precariously halfway down the track. The haunting words of the instructions resurfaced in my mind, their weight crashing upon me like an overwhelming wave. “Gravity/Weight. Be sure your car weighs as close to 5 oz as possible. Add weights until the car’s wheels and axles reach 5 oz. Don’t wait until race night to get this right. Lubrication. This is essential. Purchase a tube of graphite, and sprinkle a little in the wheel bore with the axle inserted partway.”

A sense of urgency permeated the room as a concerned trio gathered, determination etched upon their faces. The cubmaster, an unwavering pillar of support, whisked my car away to a nearby table, his hands rummaging through a box of supplies. Five minuscule lead weights were attached to my car using a strip of electrical tape, infusing the moment with a renewed sense of hope.

Once again, my car took its place among its rivals, poised for a shot at redemption. The command to “Go!” sliced through the heavy silence, accompanied by a flicker of cautious optimism. All eyes remained fixated on the track as the cars hurtled downwards. This time my car surged forward, propelled by the weights, yet despite its valiant effort, it fell agonizingly short of the elusive finish line. Frustration washed through me, threatening to extinguish the dwindling ember of hope. But fate had not yet exhausted its plans for me, insisting instead on subjecting me to further embarrassment in a third attempt, destined for failure.

Deep within my being, a quiet rebellion simmered, urging me to defy the limitations imposed upon me. When would my father truly listen? Why did I have to bear the weight of the consequences and endure the sting of humiliation on my own? At that moment, I made a silent vow to protest through my actions, choosing not to utter a single word for the remainder of the day. It was a resolute declaration, a steadfast decision that would shape the contours of future interactions.

As our car carried us home, amid the boisterous backdrop of my parents’ ongoing arguments, I listened to my father’s solemn vow to sever ties with our neighbors. The Pinewood Derby, recorded in the pages of our photo albums and ingrained in my memory, stood as a symbol of missed connections and unspoken desires fused within the lineage of our family. It also served as a poignant reminder of the complexities we navigate and the unspoken emotions that shape our relationships.

Continue to chapter 5 →

Chapter 5

When Mom Met Dad

Chapter menu ↑

During a transformative vacation in 1957, my parents’ destinies converged at my father’s aunt’s idyllic camp, which was adjacent to my maternal grandfather’s tranquil retreat on picturesque Oneida Lake. It was a place where nature’s tranquil embrace set the stage for an undeniable connection to ignite within my father’s heart. From the moment he laid eyes on Mom, he felt an unwavering certainty that she was the one he would marry. However, their love story was not without its trials, as it defied religious and denominational boundaries and challenged societal expectations.

In the early stages of their courtship, my parents encountered a tempestuous incident that cast a shadow over their blossoming relationship. A fateful encounter brought my mother face to face with the hostility of my paternal grandmother. The atmosphere was charged with tension as accusations were hurled and tempers flared. In a moment fueled by unfounded suspicion, my grandmother resorted to physical aggression, delivering a slap and even pulling my mother’s hair. The hurtful words, “You’re after my son’s money,” hung in the air, staining the memory of that day.

Weekend getaways to my grandparents’ cherished camp became a treasured tradition, a respite from the monotony of everyday life. In the company of my spirited sister, Debbie, I found comfort amidst the serene surroundings. On one rainy day, after a lively game of Candy Land on the porch, an unexpected surprise awaited us—a snapping turtle, discovered by my adventurous aunt. This newfound companion injected an element of excitement and adventure into our time at the camp.

Under the sun’s warm embrace, I stood in awe as my grandfather displayed his prowess in the art of horseshoe tossing. With his signature three-quarter rotation, each toss resounded with a symphony of ringing metal. The spirited competition and joyous camaraderie filled the atmosphere, planting indelible memories in our hearts.

Yet for Debbie and me, the pinnacle of exhilaration arrived when we climbed aboard my grandfather’s sleek black speedboat. As we urged him to go faster, the boat sliced through the water, propelling us forward with an electrifying force. The crashing waves and the wind tousling our hair amplified our joy, creating moments of pure exhilaration.

And who could forget those idyllic gatherings where the tantalizing aroma of barbecues filled the air? As we floated on black inner tubes, the gentle lapping of the lake’s shore enticed us to unwind and bask in the tranquility of the moment. These blissful encounters became an integral part of our weekends, crafting cherished memories that would forever hold a special place in our hearts.

During his formative years, my grandfather’s educational path took an unexpected turn when, at age twelve, he found himself in a defining moment of defiance. Fueled by a surge of indignant courage, he summoned the audacity to deliver a powerful punch to his teacher’s face, an act that led to his expulsion from school. This moment of rebellion stood as a striking contrast to the image of the gentle and composed grandfather I had come to know. However, as I delved deeper into the stories and the history of the Fortino family, I realized that such bold acts were not uncommon.

Since my early days in grade school, I had the pleasure of visiting my intriguing cousins, the Fortinos, and bearing witness to the diverse personalities comprising their clan. Among them was my grandfather’s brother, Uncle John, a man of influence and power as the vice president of the Syracuse Teamsters Union. His commanding presence garnered respect and admiration within our community. The Fortino lineage brimmed with individuals who defied convention and left an indelible mark that shaped our family’s narrative. Uncle John resided in West Monroe with his wife and children in a house that exuded a distinct aura of unconventional charm. The entrance, adorned with blankets that served as makeshift doors, hinted at a home where rules were bent and the unexpected thrived. As I stepped inside, my senses were greeted with the earthy scent of dirt and the sight of well-worn floors, each crevice holding tales of countless footsteps and memories. Yet it was the ceiling that commanded attention—dozens of sticky pest strips, adorned with trapped flies, some still buzzing with life. It was an odd and unforgettable sight, a curious testament to the unique experiences that unfolded within those walls.

While our community busied itself with the delicate art of planting flowers and nurturing trees, a different destiny awaited my cousin’s property, shrouded in tire-strewn intrigue. An unrelenting influx of discarded rubber transformed the land into a sprawling graveyard of eleven million tires, giving birth to the notorious “Fortino Tire dump,” an awe-inspiring spectacle that was part of a monumental $81 million cleanup. The magnitude of this endeavor mirrored the eccentricities and audacious spirit that coursed through the veins of my extraordinary cousins.

Amidst an ordinary day within the bustling confines of a Midas auto shop, a symphony of captivating voices played in my ears, pulling me into a realm of an enchanting tale. It felt as though the universe had conspired to unveil the legends that enshrouded my larger-than-life Uncle John. With each vivid retelling, his exploits transcended the boundaries of ordinary existence, acquiring an otherworldly aura. And then, like a thunderclap in the wind, a voice carried a tale of unimaginable proportions, a story in which Uncle John, propelled by his indomitable spirit, unleashed a resounding punch upon a horse, toppling the majestic creature. The audacity of such an act seized my imagination, leaving me spellbound with awe.

As the intoxicating narrative wove through my mind, a flood of memories surged forth, unveiling a series of captivating images that mirrored the tale being spun. Within the hallowed pages of my family’s treasured photo albums, amidst the sepia-toned snapshots frozen in time, I discovered a gem—a mesmerizing image encapsulating the essence of my revered grandfather and his mischievous brother, Uncle John. Their youthful countenances radiated with gleeful defiance, captured in a moment where they stood side by side, fists clenched, poised for a playful duel. It was a photograph that transcended mere paper and ink, pulsating with the indomitable spirit coursing through their veins—a visual testament to their unyielding resilience and untamed vigor.

At that stirring juncture, I found myself spellbound by the vista of fortitude and determination that portrayed the landscape of my lineage. It was a pattern that extended far beyond the confines of the Fortino family, intertwining with the storied legacy of the Ragonese clan. The tales of my grandmother’s brother, Uncle Joe Ragonese, reverberated through the generations as well. His hands, mighty in their Herculean proportions, spoke of a toughness forged through heredity and the crucible of hardships endured. Amidst the trials and tribulations, our familial gatherings resounded with a symphony of laughter—a vibrant testament to the boundless joy that permeated those cherished moments. I hold dear the vivid memories of my grandmother, whose hands, much like her brother’s, were remarkably large. They were a source of endless mirth and joy, their presence bringing laughter not only within the walls of our home but also within the hallowed halls of our church. Watching her shake hands with fellow congregants after Sunday service, her hands dwarfing theirs in a comical juxtaposition, evoked hearty chuckles and contagious smiles.

Amidst our family gatherings, my grandfather’s mischievous spirit took center stage, enchanting us with his playful nature and clever tricks. With a mischievous glint in his eye, he would beckon us to place our fingers between his, promising an unforgettable experience. “Put your fingers in here, between mine,” he would say, his voice filled with delight. Like clockwork, year after year, the same words and the same stories flowed from his lips, yet our laughter would erupt as if hearing them for the very first time. It was a testament to the timeless magic he possessed, the ability to infuse each moment with contagious joy.

End of the five-chapter sample.

Understanding the Back Cover of Luke

A guide for readers before the opening pages

Below the cover image, you will find the first ten pages of Watch.
These opening pages are meant to introduce the tone, the world, and the emotional direction of the novel, not to explain everything at once.

Before reading them, this short guide explains what the back cover blurb means, what the book is about at its core, and what kind of story you are stepping into.

The question at the heart of the novel

The back cover of Watch opens with a single question:

What if the life you believed was yours was quietly arranged long before you knew how to ask otherwise?

This question is the foundation of the book.

It asks readers to consider whether a life can be shaped without force, without cruelty, and without anyone ever saying, you must do this. A person may believe they are choosing freely, while never having been shown that other choices were possible.

The novel is about that realization, and about what happens when it begins to surface.

What “quietly arranged” means

In Watch, control does not look dramatic. It does not come through shouting or obvious threats.

It works in ordinary ways.

Who offers help
Who gives approval
What questions are encouraged
What topics are avoided
What earns trust
What feels normal

Over time, these small influences add up. The life begins to take shape, not through force, but through guidance that feels caring.

The book asks whether kindness and control can exist at the same time, and how difficult it can be to tell the difference.

Power that doesn’t look like power

The blurb describes Watch as a story about power that does not announce itself.

This means the power in the novel does not demand attention. It blends into daily life.

It decides what is acceptable
It sets expectations quietly
It rewards cooperation
It discourages questioning

Because this kind of power feels reasonable, people often accept it without noticing how much it is shaping them.

The novel is about recognizing that influence once it has already done its work.

Care that comes with conditions

The system at the center of Watch offers real benefits.

Order
Belonging
Generosity
Protection

But these come with an unspoken expectation: silence.

Silence about doubts
Silence about discomfort
Silence about contradictions

Over time, silence begins to feel like good behavior. Like maturity. Like loyalty.

The book is not accusing individuals of cruelty. It is showing how systems can slowly teach people what not to say.

When obedience starts to feel like belief

One of the most important ideas in the blurb is the moment when obedience begins to feel indistinguishable from belief.

At first, a person follows rules because it feels safer or easier. Later, those rules begin to feel true.

The novel explores how this shift happens slowly, and how unsettling it can be to realize that some beliefs may have been learned rather than chosen.

This recognition does not arrive suddenly. It builds quietly, just as the system did.

The community at the center of the story

The community in Watch is described as having order, generosity, and quiet authority.

These qualities are not accidental. They are what make the community appealing.

Order provides stability
Generosity creates trust
Quiet authority feels reassuring

The book does not present this community as simply good or bad. Instead, it asks how environments that feel safe can also shape people in ways they may not fully see.

Protection becomes design

At first, the protagonist experiences protection. Help appears when needed. Guidance feels timely. Opportunities open.

Only later does he begin to notice patterns.

Certain paths are encouraged
Certain questions are avoided
Certain outcomes seem guided

The word design suggests intention. The protagonist begins to sense that his life is being shaped toward something, not simply unfolding on its own.

This realization is subtle, but it changes everything.

Leaving is not freedom, but reckoning

The blurb makes clear that leaving such a system does not feel like escape.

It feels like reckoning.

Leaving means facing what was accepted, what was ignored, and what was traded for safety and belonging.

The novel is not about dramatic rebellion. It is about the difficult work of understanding one’s own participation in a life that once felt secure.

Why the story moves quietly

Watch is written in a restrained, thoughtful style because the kind of control it explores is quiet.

The book focuses less on big events and more on how people slowly come to accept things they might once have questioned.

Small compromises
Small silences
Small rewards

Over time, these shape a life.

The opening pages you are about to read reflect this approach. They are meant to settle you into the rhythm of the story rather than explain it outright.

Being seen versus being free

One of the novel’s central tensions is the moment when being seen begins to feel safer than being free.

Being seen means belonging. It means being known and valued.

Freedom, by contrast, can mean uncertainty and loss.

The book explores this tension without judgment, showing how understandable it is to choose safety over independence, especially when the cost of freedom is unclear.

No clear villains, no simple answers

Watch is not a story of heroes and villains.

People can care and control at the same time. They can believe they are helping while also limiting others.

Truth in this story does not arrive all at once. It emerges gradually, and it comes with consequences.

What these first ten pages are meant to do

The pages that follow are the first ten pages of the novel.

They are not meant to provide answers. They are meant to introduce the atmosphere, the voice, and the world of the story.

As you read, you may notice:

Quiet guidance
Unspoken expectations
Moments of comfort mixed with unease
A life beginning to take shape

These early pages are the beginning of recognition, not its conclusion.

The purpose of Watch

The purpose of Watch is not to tell readers what to think. It is to invite them to notice.

To notice how lives can be shaped without force
To notice how silence can feel like loyalty
To notice how belonging can come with conditions
To notice how easily obedience can become belief

And to ask a simple, unsettling question.

Was the life I was given truly the life I chose?

To All Pastors

I offer these words not in anger, but in truth, for truth is the beginning of healing.

What does it say of a man—one who held the title of pastor, shepherd, and father—if for decades he could avoid the most sacred calling of all: to reconcile with his own son? A father who, even in his final days, spoke only in superficial tones, never daring to confront the truth that lay between them, never opening the door to accountability, never acknowledging the great silence that had endured for so many years.

What kind of gospel allows this?

And more pressing still, what does it say of a church that knew—because the son himself told them—and did nothing? A church that bore witness to a long and public estrangement, and remained still. A church that turned its concern not toward justice or compassion or repair, but toward protecting an image. An image of a man. An image of itself.

If that is what your gospel protects, what then is the cost of your silence?

And what are we to think when a new pastor assumes the pulpit with full knowledge of what came before—and still, says nothing? What are we to make of leadership that inherits not just a congregation but a legacy of wounds, and chooses complacency over clarity, image over integrity?

What kind of light does such a church offer its people, when it hides from its own reflection? What healing can be preached from the pulpit, when no healing is practiced within the walls?

I have lived this story. I was the son. I wrote it down in COR Values not to accuse, but to reveal. Because I believe that only in revealing can there be restoration. I believe that silence in the face of truth is a betrayal—not just of people, but of God, of the very Spirit churches claim to follow.

You cannot preach reconciliation while avoiding it. You cannot speak of love while excusing long-held indifference. And you cannot proclaim truth if you are not willing to face it in your own house.

This is a call not to guilt, but to courage.

To every pastor, every leader, every church: the world is watching. The children are watching. The sons and daughters who were turned away, who were labeled and dismissed, are watching. And they are asking not for showmanship, not for pageantry, not for empty declarations—but for truth, for integrity, and for love that does not flinch.

A church that cannot face its own failures has no authority to speak to the brokenness of the world.

With unwavering hope that some will choose the harder, braver path,
Daniel Robert Mazur

An In-Depth Analysis of Felix the Fluke in Beyond the Morning Light

 

Due to the many comments I have received about the story of Felix the Fluke—where readers have shared various interpretations of its symbolism and metaphors—I have decided to take the time to explain my own thoughts behind its creation. While I value the different perspectives that have been brought to me, I want to clarify the deeper meanings I intended to convey.

 

Felix as a Reflection of Alden and the Human Experience

 

The story of Felix the Fluke, embedded within Beyond the Morning Light, serves as a powerful metaphor for Alden’s personal struggles, his philosophical musings, and his relationship with his father, family, and faith. At the same time, it also reflects themes that I, as the author, have explored in my own life—particularly in my journey toward self-expression and independence. This narrative within a narrative offers a deeply symbolic reflection on existence, survival, and the human condition, drawing parallels between Alden’s personal journey and the broader truths I have sought to convey.

 

Felix, a tiny liver fluke living inside a Bengal cat named Sable, represents Alden’s own perceived insignificance in the vast world around him. Just as Felix exists within an environment he cannot fully comprehend, Alden navigates forces that shape his life—his father’s expectations, the church, societal structures—without fully understanding their origins or long-term consequences. Felix’s story mirrors Alden’s journey in several key ways:

 

  1. The Unseen Yet Sensed Presence – Felix cannot see Beatrice, the elderly woman who owns Sable, just as humans cannot see God, the universe, or other unseen forces. Yet, he senses a higher force influencing his existence. This parallels Alden’s struggles with faith and his search for meaning in a world governed by unseen influences.
  2. The Burden of Awareness – Felix becomes self-aware, recognizing that his survival depends on consuming Sable’s liver, and with that awareness comes guilt. He realizes that his natural tendencies will ultimately lead to the demise of his host. This mirrors Alden’s realization that his own self-awareness and growing independence, while necessary for his personal growth, contribute to the deterioration of his relationship with his father. Awareness, rather than bringing peace, brings inner turmoil and existential questioning.
  3. The Inevitable Role in the Cycle of Life – Felix eventually understands that he cannot change his fundamental nature. This realization reflects Alden’s own internal battle—whether to fight against the structures that have defined him or to accept them as part of his reality. The struggle for autonomy against forces beyond one’s control is a persistent theme in Alden’s life and a central exploration in my own work as an author.

 

The Connection to Alden’s Father and My Own Journey

 

A key element of Beyond the Morning Light is Alden’s relationship with his father, which is mirrored in Felix’s relationship with Sable and the unseen Beatrice. Just as Felix’s actions have consequences for beings he cannot directly perceive, Alden’s choices and struggles exist within a larger familial and societal framework.

 

However, these struggles are not solely Alden’s—they also reflect aspects of my own experience in grappling with autonomy, self-expression, and family expectations. The novel serves as both an intimate character study of Alden and an extension of my own process of breaking free from control and allowing my voice to be heard.

 

Felix and Sable’s Relationship as a Metaphor for Alden and His Father

 

Felix’s relationship with Sable encapsulates Alden’s complex and evolving connection with his father. Just as Felix is completely dependent on Sable for survival, Alden was once entirely reliant on his father’s approval, validation, and sense of structure. However, this dependency is not without consequence—Felix’s very existence erodes the health of his host, much like Alden’s growing self-awareness and independence strain his relationship with his father, ultimately leading to its demise.

 

The more Felix feeds, the more he brings harm to the entity that sustains him. In a parallel sense, Alden’s journey of self-discovery—the realization that he is an individual beyond his father’s expectations—introduces an irreversible shift in their dynamic. Awareness, in both cases, acts as a double-edged sword. Felix cannot exist without harming Sable, and Alden cannot grow into his full self without distancing himself from the influence of his father. The realization that autonomy requires separation is as painful as it is inevitable.

 

For me, as the author, this theme is deeply personal. Self-expression, particularly through writing, has been both a means of resistance and a path to liberation. Yet, this liberation has not come without a cost. Just as Alden’s journey toward self-definition leads to the unraveling of his relationship with his father, my own embrace of my voice and truth has created an unbridgeable distance between me and the person who once shaped my world. Writing has not only been an act of discovery but also an act of separation—a necessary step toward autonomy that, like Felix’s existence within Sable, alters the balance of what once was.

 

Broader Themes of Survival, Morality, and Power

 

The story of Felix also engages with Alden’s earlier philosophical reflections on intelligent creatures whose survival depends on the demise of others—a concept that extends beyond the literal parasite-host dynamic.

 

  • The Inescapability of Predation – Whether it is Felix feeding on Sable, Sable preying on smaller creatures, or humans consuming animals, life persists through the consumption of others. This raises moral questions about existence itself and whether survival is inherently exploitative. This theme resonates not only with Alden’s reflections but also with my broader inquiry into the structures that shape us—religious, societal, and familial systems that, in their own way, consume individuals.
  • Does Intelligence Change the Moral Dilemma? – Felix, unlike other flukes, is aware of his impact on Sable. Similarly, Alden’s self-awareness causes him to question his own role in the systems that shaped him. This mirrors human struggles with morality—does understanding our impact change our responsibilities, or are we simply playing out roles imposed by larger unseen forces? As the author, I have explored these same dilemmas—both intellectually and personally.
  • Control Versus Acceptance – Just as Felix cannot change his fundamental nature, Alden grapples with the idea of whether he can ever truly escape the influences of his past. His journey toward self-acceptance echoes Felix’s final realization that awareness does not always lead to change—it sometimes only leads to understanding. Similarly, as I reflect on my own path, I recognize that some structures cannot be dismantled—but they can be outgrown, transcended, and redefined through the act of storytelling.

 

Conclusion: The Power of Felix’s Story

 

The story of Felix the Fluke serves as an intricate allegory, tying together Alden’s existential reflections, his struggles with his father, and the overarching themes of faith, control, and self-awareness. Yet, it is also a reflection of my own journey, the struggles I have overcome, and the questions I continue to explore through my writing. Ultimately, Felix the Fluke is a meditation on awareness, autonomy, and the act of finding one’s voice—whether in fiction, in reality, or in the space between.

December 22, 2024

Pastor Bryan Rocine and Members of the Board,

 

The doctrine of separation within The Living Word Church is not merely a mistake of the past; it is a festering wound, a moral failure that continues to inflict immeasurable pain on those it has harmed. For decades, this doctrine has ravaged families, alienated devoted individuals, and destroyed the bonds that form the cornerstone of any healthy community. Its legacy is not confined to history; it reverberates in the present and, if left unaddressed, will haunt the Church far into the future.

And yet, the Church continues to deny the very existence of this doctrine. You claim it does not exist, that there is no policy, no teaching of separation. But I know what I have seen. I know what I have heard. Growing up in Syracuse, I witnessed this doctrine in action. I have heard it in sermons, not just in person but also broadcast over the internet after I moved to Miami. Bryan, you know this to be true because I have written to you about it repeatedly over the years. Time and again, I raised these concerns, only to be met with silence or avoidance. You have failed to address these matters, failed to engage with the truth, and failed to take responsibility for the harm caused.

I still have the letters between us, Bryan. If you need a reminder of your failure to address this issue, of your very own words spoken from the pulpit, I can send them to you again. Do you recall when I wrote to you about my concerns regarding your teachings on the need for separation from family? Do you remember, Bryan, how I warned you that I would inform the Syracuse community of your harmful actions and your belief in separating people from their loved ones? Your response was not one of accountability or willingness to engage, but a demand that our correspondence remain confidential, subtly implying that sharing your words with others could result in legal consequences. Do you remember that?

And, Bryan, do you remember what followed? A day or two later, the police arrived at my home. They claimed my father had informed them I was building a bomb with the intention of blowing up the church. They searched my home, Bryan. Do you recall me telling you this? Do you remember how I wrote to you about this, how I even documented it in my book, COR Values? These actions—your silence, your veiled threats, and the sudden police intervention—paint a chilling picture of the lengths to which you and others were willing to go to suppress the truth.

The excuses used to justify inaction are many, but none withstand scrutiny. Some claim, “It was in the past,” as though the passage of time alone absolves the Church of its sins. But time does not heal wounds that remain untreated. Others argue, “These are family matters,” as if relegating the pain caused to the private sphere relieves the Church of its moral responsibility. This dismissal not only trivializes the harm inflicted but abdicates the Church’s duty to lead with integrity and accountability. Still, others hide behind, “It’s all hearsay,” attempting to diminish the lived experiences of those who have suffered as if their voices lack credibility. This excuse is particularly insidious, for it silences the very people who have been wronged and denies their suffering a rightful place in the Church’s conscience.

And then there is the most egregious justification of all: “We no longer reject others, so there is no need to do anything.” This claim is not only insufficient but offensive. Ceasing to harm is not the same as making amends. To adopt this excuse is to ignore the ongoing ripple effects of the past—broken families, lingering pain, and lives permanently altered by rejection and alienation. It is to close your eyes to the scars left behind and pretend they do not exist. This is not progress; it is avoidance, and it is a betrayal of the very principles of accountability and healing that Christianity proclaims.

Another, perhaps unspoken, rationale for inaction is the fear of tarnishing the Church’s reputation. This fear betrays a deeper problem: the prioritization of institutional image over the well-being of the people the Church claims to serve. But what good is a spotless façade if the foundation beneath it is rotting? A Church that fears the truth more than it values justice has already failed in its mission.

Lastly, there is the excuse of complacency, the subtle yet pervasive belief that addressing the past is simply too difficult, too uncomfortable, too disruptive. But Christianity is not a faith of convenience. It demands sacrifice, courage, and an unwavering commitment to truth. To shy away from this challenge is to admit that comfort has become more important than conviction, that maintaining the status quo outweighs the call to embody the love, reconciliation, and justice at the heart of the Gospel.

You tell the congregation you are a humble servant of the Lord. You publicly admit your shortcomings, even going so far as to announce your phone number from the pulpit, inviting those harmed by so-called “mistakes” or “misunderstandings” to call you so you can ask for their understanding and forgiveness. Yet you and I both know the truth: you have no genuine interest in engaging with those who have been hurt. This is not humility; it is a façade, a carefully crafted performance to reinforce the image you wish your congregation to believe—a false portrait of yourself as humble, human, and capable of failure.

I know this because I was one of those people who called you. I reached out, seeking an honest and meaningful conversation, only to be met with refusal and indifference. It was clear to me then, as it is now, that your so-called humility is hollow, a tool used to placate those who might otherwise demand accountability.

This pattern of behavior extends beyond you, Bryan. It is clearly reflected in your son, Isaiah, another leader within your church, whom I have recently met. I will never forget the day he shook my hand in front of a group of people, including my brother Paul. He looked me in the eye and said, “I owe you one,” acknowledging the validity of my calling him out on a cowardly act, an act he openly admitted was wrong. In that moment, I forgave him, believing his words to be genuine, that he had recognized his wrongdoing and felt sincere remorse.

Yet, once the audience had dispersed and no one remained to hold him accountable, his actions exposed a starkly different reality. He reverted to the same cowardly behavior, revealing not only his dishonesty but also the deeply troubling nature of leadership that has permeated not just the leadership of your church but your family as well. This conduct is profoundly disgraceful, standing as a direct betrayal of the principles the Church is meant to uphold. It erodes the foundation of trust, integrity, and moral leadership that the Church is called to embody.

I write to you today not as a Christian, but as someone who has been immersed in its teachings since childhood. Although I am an atheist, I cannot ignore the profound beauty and moral clarity embedded in the values your faith professes to uphold. I understand its call for compassion, its pursuit of justice, and its unwavering commitment to truth. In addressing you, I am choosing to engage with the language of your faith, to invoke the scripture that forms the foundation of your beliefs, in order to highlight the glaring contradiction between the Church’s actions and the mission it claims to serve.

 

The rejection and ostracization of good people, the destruction of fellowship and family bonds, are not just betrayals of individuals. They are betrayals of the Gospel itself. Christianity, at its core, demands accountability. Its teachings call for love, reconciliation, and the restoration of what has been broken. The words of Jesus leave no ambiguity: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:37-40). To divide families, to sever bonds of love and community, is to act in direct opposition to these commands.

The doctrine of separation is a betrayal of Christianity itself. At its heart, your faith esteems family as sacred. The Apostle Paul declares, “If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his immediate family, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (1 Timothy 5:8). How, then, can The Living Word Church justify tearing families apart, severing the bonds of love and connection that form the bedrock of human life? Community, too, is fundamental to Christian teaching. Jesus said, “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” (John 13:35). Yet the Church’s actions have been marked not by love but by exclusion, judgment, and rejection.

These choices are not merely a betrayal of individuals; they are a betrayal of the Gospel itself. Scripture warns against hypocrisy: “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to” (Matthew 23:13). This is not a hypothetical warning; it is the precise indictment the Church now faces.

I write to you with the weight of personal experience. My own family has borne the crushing burden of this doctrine. Some members, now gone, left this world carrying the scars inflicted by the Church’s rejection. Others remain, their lives irreparably shaped by wounds that never healed. I refuse to allow their suffering, and the suffering of countless others, to be erased by indifference or buried under the veil of willful ignorance. This is not a matter of preference for me; it is a moral obligation. To remain silent would be to betray not only those I love but also the principles of truth and justice that transcend belief systems.

Let there be no misunderstanding: this matter will not rest. It will be addressed, with or without your cooperation. The tide of awareness among members of The Living Word Church is rising, and it will not be turned back. You do not face a choice between addressing this issue or ignoring it. You face a choice between leading this reckoning with wisdom and humility or watching it unfold beyond your control. Every moment you resist deepens the damage to the Church’s legacy, its mission, and its people.

Let me be clear. I will not stop. I will not falter. This effort to demand accountability and reconciliation will continue until one of two outcomes is reached: either these injustices are resolved, or my time on this earth comes to an end. This is not a threat; it is a promise born of conviction. I have no desire for discord within the Church, but I will not allow peace to be purchased at the expense of truth. The harm inflicted must be acknowledged. The wrongs must be owned. The wounds must be healed. Anything less is complicity in ongoing injustice.

Pastor Rocine and members of the Board, this is your moment. This is your opportunity to lead, not by preserving the status quo or evading discomfort, but by rising to the moral and spiritual responsibility that your positions demand. Acknowledge the truth. Take responsibility for the harm done. Guide the Church toward healing and reconciliation. To do otherwise is to reject the principles of love and justice that your faith commands and to embrace a legacy of silence and failure.

This is not a question of preference; it is a certainty. The reckoning will come. The only question is whether you will face it with courage and integrity or wait until circumstances force your hand. The time for action is now. The decision is yours.

Respectfully and resolutely,

Daniel Robert Mazur

Seeking Change Through Texting

July 8th, 2024

 

Earlier this year, I received an invitation to a wedding—a rare and significant event in my life. Apart from my father’s funeral and a nephew’s graduation ceremony, it was the first major family gathering I had ever been invited to attend. At sixty-two, with two brothers and two sisters, all married with many children, I had missed countless milestones over the years—birthdays, weddings, and more. This time, however, I vowed to attend.

 

I flew to Syracuse during the last week of June, filled with anticipation. The wedding was not just an opportunity to reconnect with my niece and her family but also a chance to spend precious time with my mother before returning to Miami. I booked a few extra days, and the excitement of reuniting with loved ones and being part of such a joyous occasion made this trip unforgettable.

About a week before my departure, it dawned on me that being in Syracuse meant I would likely cross paths with many people from the church—a prospect that stirred a mix of emotions. Among them was Bryan Rocine, who had recently made a public appeal from the pulpit, offering his personal cell phone number to anyone he had harmed, inviting them to reach out so he could apologize. This was an opportunity too significant to ignore.

The timing felt right, so prior to leaving for Syracuse, I decided to take him up on his offer. However, instead of calling and talking with him, I chose a more measured approach and initiated a text dialogue. As my fingers hovered over the screen, I couldn’t help but wonder what lay ahead in this conversation. Would it be a step toward healing or just another painful reminder of the past? With a deep breath, I typed my first message, setting in motion a dialogue that would challenge my perceptions and potentially reveal the true nature of his intentions.

From the onset, I harbored deep doubts about whether Bryan Rocine had truly changed. If genuine transformation had taken place, surely the many people he had wronged would have told me. To me, his public announcement felt more like a self-serving gesture—a declaration designed to appease the congregation and suggest that nothing more needed to be done or said.

However, family members and a few others assured me that Bryan had indeed changed and that the church was now committed to caring for those who had been harmed in the past. Reluctantly, I decided to extend the benefit of the doubt and engaged in the written exchange.

Each text message I received was scrutinized; each response I sent was deliberate. The words exchanged between us would reveal whether his proclaimed repentance was genuine or just a facade. Has he truly changed? Read the text dialogue and decide for yourself.

 

The Text Exchange

Dan: Why would a man publicly announce his availability for anyone to contact him? What is the true message here? Is it genuinely for those who may wish to reach out to him, or is it merely a performance for the world to perceive him as accessible and accountable?
If this person sincerely believes he has unjustly harmed others, should he not already know who these individuals are and take the initiative to reach out to them directly?
Imagine a scenario where someone spends thirty-six years meticulously documenting the ways in which he and others have been harmed by this man, compiling these details into a manuscript and placing it before him. Such an effort far exceeds any public declaration of willingness to accept calls from those wronged, ostensibly to discuss and make amends. Yet, this manuscript would be ignored, and any attempt to bring it to light would be vehemently suppressed and attacked.
What does this say about such a person? He has constructed a world that he and others inhabit, a realm he will defend at all costs. He is a consummate salesman, perpetually presenting his pitch to anyone at his doorstep. Until his final days, he will fabricate stories to preserve the comforts he has created for himself.
This is not a man of integrity, honor, or character to be admired. He is someone from whom people need to protect themselves, lest they fall victim to his deceitful machinations.

Bryan: Is this Daniel? What do you prefer to be called? Dan? Danny? Daniel?
Please forgive me for the unnecessary, unhelpful pain I have caused you. I forgive you for the same.
Judging by the caustic and cynical position of your text we may not be able to continue with any communication.

Dan: To seek my forgiveness and, in the same breath, label my message as caustic and cynical, does not reflect the actions of an honest or sincere individual. Have you ever considered that true contrition and criticism cannot coexist in a single plea for forgiveness? True repentance demands humility and self-reflection, not judgment and reproach.

Dan: But perhaps, upon further reflection, I am mistaken, and your message is sincere. I have been wrong before, many times in fact. If you genuinely seek my forgiveness, it is a request I am bound by duty and conscience to consider. Please tell me, what is it that you believe you have done to me for which you seek forgiveness? Without this clarity, I find myself without even the option to offer forgiveness. How can I say I forgive you without knowing what I am forgiving you for?

Dan: Bryan, I ask you once more: what is it you wish me to forgive you for? What have you done that you regret, that you acknowledge has caused me harm? Are you sorry for rejecting my pleas for help when I sought your assistance in reaching out to my father years ago, unlike other pastors who showed compassion and tried to help? Are you sorry for judging me and labeling me as a rebellious son without ever having a conversation with me about my life and my relationship with my father, relying solely on the biased views of others? Are you sorry for ignoring my request to visit me and understand my perspective through the lens of those who have known me for decades here in Miami? What is it that you want my forgiveness for? Is it any of this?

How can you know what has caused me harm if you do not ask or tell me what you seek forgiveness for? What have you done? Why wouldn’t you first acknowledge your wrongdoing? What meaning could “forgiving you” possibly have without knowing what for? Maybe you don’t feel there’s anything wrong with the actions I’ve mentioned that harmed me. If this is the case, and I simply say “I forgive you,” would that not be entirely incoherent and meaningless? If you never tell me what you’ve done wrong, how can I believe that it is forgiveness you seek and not something else entirely?

In our past correspondence, I asked you many questions, most of which you refused to answer, choosing instead to disparage me. No other pastor in Syracuse treated me with the same distance and disdain as you did, claiming to know my thoughts, even going so far as to say “God is my arch enemy.” How is it that so many years have passed, and you have yet to address these wrongs? Are you different today? Do you now acknowledge that your behavior was wrong and regret it? How am I to know? Why is this so difficult for you?

Dan: What do you truly know of me, of my life? You know I was committed to a mental institution, but do you understand the circumstances? Instead of judging me as a reprobate and a God-hater, did you ever think to ask me? Did you ever consider that you might have been contributing to the damage inflicted upon me? Maybe you have, and this is what you’re asking my forgiveness for. How can you not understand how meaningless it is to ask for forgiveness without stating what for? You are a pastor, someone who is supposed to study these matters for the benefit of others.

Take this as criticism if you must, but I simply do not understand your behavior. As a leader, with many eyes on you, the responsibility of your position is immense. Should you not put every fiber of your being into getting these things right? And as a leader, should you not focus more on your own actions rather than defending your wrongdoings by pointing out that others have wronged you too?

Where is the wisdom I longed to see for decades that would have had me by my father’s side, a member of your congregation? Your position demands a higher standard, one that requires introspection and accountability. It is time to reflect on your actions and genuinely seek to understand the impact they have had on others, especially those who looked to you for guidance and support.

Dan: When the police came to my door, claiming my father told them I was building a bomb to blow up the church, did you have a hand in that? Is it too much to ask for you to tell me the truth? This occurred around the same time you wrote to me, insisting our correspondence was confidential while subtly threatening me not to disclose your comments to others. The people I know here, when told of such events, say you all are nuts, that you all are crazy people and I need to stay away from you. Why don’t you provide evidence to the contrary? What do you know about the police searching my home for a bomb or the FBI investigating me? When I’ve asked you for similar information before, your response was simply to attack my character. Should I expect differently today? Or have you changed? Will you be forthcoming? Is any of this what you seek my forgiveness for?

Dan: When the police came to my door, claiming my father told them I was building a bomb to blow up the church, did you have a hand in that? Is it too much to ask for you to tell me the truth? This occurred around the same time you wrote to me, insisting our correspondence was confidential while subtly threatening me not to disclose your comments to others. The people I know here, when told of such events, say you all are nuts, that you all are crazy people and I need to stay away from you. Why don’t you provide evidence to the contrary? What do you know about the police searching my home for a bomb or the FBI investigating me? When I’ve asked you for similar information before, your response was simply to attack my character. Should I expect differently today? Or have you changed? Will you be forthcoming? Is any of this what you seek my forgiveness for?

Dan: This matter transcends forgiveness and enters the realm of accountability, embodying the true essence of taking responsibility for past wrongs. As a pastor, it is your duty to address the injustices perpetrated against me from the very pulpit of your church. Perhaps you are unaware, but to this day, I remain estranged from my brother David. I was deeply upset when he stood before the congregation, misrepresenting my thoughts and praising you all, claiming I saw the “good” in you and how “perfect” the memorial service was. I never said such things. In fact, I had confided in him about the immense challenge it was for me to stay calm in an environment that severely tested my well-being.
I had hoped that the days of being disparaged and lied about from the pulpit, as my father did, had ended with his passing. Yet, when I expressed my distress to my brother, he showed no inclination to make amends. If you have truly changed, you should understand that seeking forgiveness is not enough. The matter must be addressed and corrected. The congregation needs to hear the truth about the past—about who I am, who I was, and what I did not say or do.
I have already taken steps to set the record straight in my book, where I speak the truth for anyone who cares to seek it. If you are a true seeker of truth, you will understand the importance of these matters and will ensure that the falsehoods spoken about me from your pulpit are corrected from that same pulpit. Yet, at this very moment, I have no idea if these are the matters you regret your participation in. As all this transpired, you stood there, hands folded by my father’s side. Who are you today, Mr. Rocine? Are you the same man who stood silent, or have you become someone who will confront the past and embrace the truth?

Dan: So tell me that I am wrong, that my belief in your lack of integrity has been misplaced. Assure me that doing what is right is indeed paramount to you, even when it doesn’t align with your desired outcome. Tell me that my understanding of your true nature, of who you really are, has been mistaken all these years. Proclaim that you believe in justice and truth above all, and that personal wants and desires play no part in your decision-making process, especially in matters that affect those harmed by the organization you are part of. Show me that you stand for what is right, regardless of the cost. Demonstrate to me, and to everyone who doubts, that you embody the principles you preach, and that truth and justice guide your every action.

Dan: The narrative of my experience with your church has been purposefully contorted and contrived to suit the needs of others. You have all misunderstood me profoundly. It is for these reasons that I published my book. Additionally, I have created a short video—a slide presentation—that you and others in your congregation need to see. It is something you should willingly present to your group to set the record straight.

Dan: https://youtube.com/watch?v=n2Coj-eOYaw

Dan: Your integrity is under scrutiny. Having confessed to wrongdoing, you must face the consequences with courage, not retreat. Your role as a leader, an influencer, and a pastor demands accountability and unwavering transparency.

Bryan: Thanks for your explanation. Somethings are becoming clear to me.
Please forgive me for not being a greater help to you when you were a teen when I was trying to be a good influence on the teens in the church. Shame on me I gave up on you. Please forgive me for the harshness of my emails to you some years ago.
Here’s what I am realizing. You don’t have an accurate picture of what is going on in our church community regarding yourself. No one I know sicked the FBI on you. I had nothing to do with it. Id be shocked to learn your dad did. He was very quiet about you.
There has been next to zero public statements about you. I recall very brief and uncritical, 40 years ago like, “My son asked me to stay home from church for him. I couldn’t do that. “. (I summarize.)
I have never that I remember preached a single word about you knowingly or intentionally. The church is very quiet and respectful about what we consider Mazur family business. We don’t gossip about you. We hardly think about you.
I hardly ever talk about you to anyone. And hardly ever for more than a sentence . Most of any talk is in prayer. You are not a bigger topic or a preoccupation around here than anyone else.
My texts take a long time to come back to you because I have many other people to prioritize ahead of you.

Dan: This message feels like the beginning of a meaningful dialogue, and for that, I am deeply grateful. As I reflect on the past, I harbor no resentment for any perceived lack of encouragement during my teenage years. My greater concern lies with the events that have transpired in the years that followed.
I’m unsure if you’ve read my book, but it contains crucial information that sheds light on my comments. For instance, shortly after I moved to South Florida, the FBI came knocking on my door. This was a direct consequence of my father’s actions—something you might not have known. Considering everything else that has transpired, this shouldn’t come as a shock, though it’s possible you were unaware.
You mentioned there have been “zero” public statements about me. This is not true. I have received copies of several statements embedded in the sermons of the organization you now head. I’ll share one of them with you here; it’s an audio recording from the pulpit. I would appreciate your thoughts on this message made within your church and whether you believe such a comment should be addressed or corrected. My father has claimed, and even insisted to me and others, that he has not discouraged my siblings or anyone from having a relationship with me. This is an outright lie, one of many manipulations I can prove have existed, and as a person in your position, you have a responsibility to address it. This is one of many circumstances occurring long after my teenage years that I ask you to respond to and address.
You claim not to gossip about me, yet you have written extremely harsh criticisms of my character. From where your conclusions about me originate, I can only speculate. These comments, a few of which I have already addressed in this thread, are very damaging and have compounded other false claims and attacks that have caused significant harm, not just to me, but to others as well. It’s these criticisms of yours, not anything from my teenage years, that I want you to address.
I also want to remind you of the time I invited you to Miami to meet people who know me, rather than relying on the damaging comments of others. Instead of accepting or even responding to my sincere offer, you accused me of being obsessed with you and justifying myself to you. These examples of your behavior are what concern me and deserve a proper response.
There is much more to discuss, but addressing these points would be a good start.

Dan: https://drive.datadupe.com/f/1e2a84c315aa4fe6ad8d/

Dan: You need to understand that the entire narrative surrounding my departure from my family and your church has been a gross manipulation and complete mischaracterization of the truth. I urge you to watch the video clip I sent you, if you haven’t already. It accurately represents what truly happened, unlike the false narrative constructed for you and the church members to believe. This narrative was crafted to fit a misleading image of who I am and how I should be perceived.

Dan: This false narrative endures, continuing to fuel the rift between me and family members, especially my brother David. It has become an impenetrable wall that must be torn down. Only by confronting and dismantling these misconceptions can healing begin and genuine reconciliation be found.

Dan: Before I continue with my workday, I’d like to share one more point for you to ponder. It concerns the contrasting perspectives I hold of you and my father. Throughout our communications, I have never questioned your honesty. I’ve never caught you in a lie or observed any intentional deceit. Perhaps you truly believed, at least at the time, the negative sentiments you expressed about me. I cannot say with certainty whether you are a dishonest person, but dishonesty is not something I have witnessed from you.

However, it’s crucial to recognize that my father possessed a deeply troubling characteristic. He was not just dishonest; he engaged in deceit far beyond simple dishonesty. Simply stated, as painful as it is to say this about one’s own father, my dad was not an honest man. He was capable of crafting and spreading the most untruthful stories to achieve his desires. Whether you have discovered or acknowledged this yet, you eventually need to contemplate this harsh reality. If you are ever to move forward in situations like mine and others, with a godly purpose aligned with the teachings of the Bible, you will eventually need to cross this bridge. You will need to face this most uncomfortable truth, as I have, about who my father truly was.

Did he believe in many good things? Was he a great contributor to the well-being of others? Certainly, he was. However, this characteristic you may identify as a sin had dire consequences. No matter how much good anyone does, it is vital to address such deficiencies to prevent further damaging consequences. In the end, it is not merely our actions that define us, but our willingness to confront the uncomfortable truths about those we love and ourselves. Only then can we strive for true integrity and redemption.

Dan: It’s 12:45 AM. I usually wake at 2 AM every weekday morning to begin my day. But not this morning. What you wrote to me yesterday, about my father telling you I asked him to stay home from church for me, has kept me up all night, unable to sleep. So, as I have often done when dwelling on poignant moments of my past, I turn to my pen.
The moment I read your message, I knew exactly which day you were referring to. Your message from my father—whether you recall his words clearly, partially, or exactly as he said them—brought back memories I cannot shake. I remember that day vividly, as it was during a formative time in my youth. I was going through a crisis, the specifics of which blur among many, but the significance of that moment stands out starkly.
The crisis was as severe as when I needed to speak with my father about being molested by someone in my younger years who I had just learned was coming to town and would be visiting my family. Despite my distress and the gravity of the situation, my father refused to even be late for church to address my crisis. That response shifted my concern from the crisis itself to a more devastating, ongoing issue between me and my father.
No, I did not ask my father to forfeit his presence at church that day to be with me. My request was simply for him to understand the gravity of my situation and the worth of a moment with me, even if it meant risking being late for one of his meetings. Whether he misrepresented that day to you, or if you are absolutely certain he told you I expected him to forfeit his church attendance, then he certainly did. And if he did, that encapsulates the problem between us.

Dan: During my youth, any significant event in my life was often altered by my father to fit a narrative that suited his interests. For instance, in my book, I recounted a story about a fight I got into with a school kid. The entire incident was my doing, my fault, and I needed to be admonished and to learn a lesson about the wrong I did. However, when I approached my father to explain what happened, despite my extreme efforts to be truthful and represent what truly happened, he would not hear it. He turned the story entirely around and made it part of his sermon the following Friday evening, about how Christians need to defend themselves when attacked by sinners.
This is just one anecdote representing my lifelong struggle to communicate with a father who not only would not hear me but was willing to present me to others in an untruthful way that suited his narrative. He molded every significant moment to fit his interests, to serve the purpose of his church and other ambitions, many of which I believed then, and today are very good, but not worthy of the many deceptive means I observed his accomplishments achieved by.
What truly concerns me, what haunts me in the quiet hours of the night, is not merely the events themselves but the chasm they created between us. A chasm built on misrepresentation and a lack of understanding that has left me, even decades later, grappling with the lifetime of silence between us that he enforced and ensured until his dying days.

Dan: I wanted to let you know that my aunt will be at the church tomorrow. I feel very strongly that a warm hello from you would be very well received. Rest assured, I will ensure there are no concerns about any difficulties from me.

Bryan: Nice of you to give a “heads up.” Thanks.

Dan: Good morning, Bryan,
I want to express my heartfelt gratitude for making my aunt feel welcomed at the church. Despite her initial reservations, she deeply appreciated attending the Sunday morning service. A particularly significant moment for her was reconnecting with an old acquaintance and coworker from General Motors. Despite a past rift, he approached her with open arms, genuinely happy to see her. This was just one of several similar positive experiences she encountered.
For me, this experience illuminated the inherent goodness in others. Your son, Isaiah, especially stood out. I had the pleasure of spending time with him at the wedding and after the Sunday sermon. Isaiah was approachable and engaging, and our conversation left me eager to learn more about him and your family.
Interestingly, Isaiah knew very little about me, including the fact that I have published a book. This lack of awareness was surprising, especially considering I discovered yesterday that even my own niece, Natalie, was unaware of it. It seems that those I spoke with were not particularly interested in learning more about me, which was unexpected given my deep curiosity about them. This realization was both informative and eye-opening.
During our conversation, Isaiah asked why I am not a Christian. Given our shared background and exposure to the Living Word Church, I found it difficult to provide a concise answer in the moment. Interestingly, it was my nephew, Davie, a close friend of Isaiah, who told him everything he knew about me. The only thing he knew was simply that I am an atheist. I found it intriguing that this was what came to mind when asked about who I was. Additionally, my nephew had confided in me that intimate relationships with non-Christians, people like me, were not possible for him. This revelation was profoundly impactful and is crucial to understanding my perspective.
In retrospect, I believe a chapter from my book encapsulates my reasons for not being involved in your church and why my beliefs have diverged from those in attendance. This chapter delves into the theme of family and the potential for positive relationships between people of differing beliefs. It explores how these relationships, once full of promise, were shattered by stringent dogma that, in my view, needed to be more flexible to keep good people together instead of apart. This rigid adherence to unyielding doctrines, I believe, undermines the possibility of unity and mutual respect among individuals with diverse perspectives. The chapter seeks to convey the profound impact of these dynamics on my own journey and relationships.
If Isaiah is interested in knowing more about me and my perspective, could you kindly provide him with the following link to this chapter?
https://drive.datadupe.com/f/6d9983bda451435781ab/
Once again, thank you for greeting my aunt and making her feel welcome on Sunday morning. Your kindness did not go unnoticed.

Dan: Your sermon last Sunday morning, titled “The Power of Repentance,” left a profound impact on me. You began by referencing Mark, where John the Baptist preached repentance for the forgiveness of sins, drawing the entire Judean countryside and the people of Jerusalem to confess their sins. You emphasized the transformative power of repentance, asserting that it can alter the course of one’s life. Repentance, you stressed, offers a pathway to forgiveness, severing the chains of wickedness that bind us to our past and preventing it from dragging us into the depths of despair.
You explained that repentance involves both intellect and emotion, compelling us to feel genuine sorrow for our wrongdoings. This change in attitude moves us away from fault-finding and toward self-reflection. Quoting Jeremiah, you lamented how few people genuinely repent, asking, “What have I done?” You urged us to ask the Lord this crucial question, and to follow it with, “What shall I do?”—a significant step in the process of repentance.
After the sermon, my mother, aunt, Jody, and I dined at The Waterfront Tavern in Central Square, where the sermon became the central topic of our conversation. The emphasis on forgiveness resonated deeply with me, sparking hope for a meaningful dialogue with you. I listened intently to your sermon and engaged in discussion with my family and friend, Jody.
I shared with Jody how my ears perked up when you spoke of repentance and forgiveness. Your repeated call to ask, “What have I done?” and “What shall I do?” filled me with excitement and hope. It struck me that just as we seek forgiveness from God through repentance, we must also seek forgiveness from those we have wronged. This vital aspect seemed missing from the sermon, and I hoped it might appear in your concluding remarks.
When I expressed this to Jody, she responded, “Well, the service is only so long. Brother Bryan can’t fit everything into one sermon.” To which I replied, “Do you mean the message I just shared with you—something you clearly understand—delivered in less than sixty seconds?”
My visit with my family lasted an entire week, from one Wednesday to the next. Though the invitation to my niece’s wedding required fewer days, I chose to stay longer to spend precious time with my aging mother. This extended visit allowed for many moments of deep conversation between us, often centering around the current and past activities of our family and the church, some of which I have already shared with you.
Throughout this past week, my mother has increasingly acknowledged the past wrongdoings of her church, my father, and herself. She has continually sought my forgiveness for her role in these events—transgressions she has confessed and for which I have long forgiven her. Our conversations have revealed her growing understanding of my beliefs, and she often says, “Danny, you’re not an atheist; I just don’t believe it.” To this, I respond, “Mom, today I am; tomorrow I may be something else.”
She insists, “But you believe in God. You must, I can tell.” I reply, “Well, if He exists, where can I find Him—in your church?” This gives her pause, as she has come to realize the extent of the wrongs, deceit, and harmful behavior that have made it impossible for people like me, who have strived to live according to Christian principles, to remain connected not only to the church but also to their own family.
During my visit, I had the opportunity to visit Mary Sorrendino on Monday. As you’re aware, Mary once attended the Living Word Church and even taught Sunday School there for about ten years. I recently read her book, Misery to Ministry, where she recounts a traumatic event she and her sister experienced when they first attended the church.
Mary’s sister was about to deliver a child, but tragically, the baby was stillborn. Not knowing how to handle the situation, Mary called our home to speak with my father, her pastor. My mother answered the phone and told Mary that the church does not handle such matters and that there was nothing they could do. There was no offer of sympathy or mention that the church would pray for her sister and her family.
Furthermore, due to the church’s doctrine against secular counsel, no external support was sought. Mary’s sister, adhering to the church’s teachings, refrained from seeking the necessary help. Consequently, they endured greater and unnecessary suffering, difficulties that could have been mitigated with proper counsel and support.
Considering everything thus far, I intend to send another message to my mother. If she is truly interested in my belief in God, she has the capacity to demonstrate a quality that, if He exists, He would surely possess. I have often stated that while I do not yet know where God is, I do know where He is not.
I would ask my mother to show me that, unlike so much I’ve seen in the past, a member of the Living Word Church has the courage to do what the Bible says and embody the principles you preach. The truth of Mary’s claims and the accuracy of her memories—do these even matter? Do we need a witness? The fact is, Mary and her sister were hurt.
What if my mother found the courage to invite Mary and her sister over for coffee? What if she allowed them to express their pain without judgment? My God, the woman lost her child. Is it too late? Is it ever too late to show love, care, and concern for another? To acknowledge where we have fallen short and ask for forgiveness?
This gesture could be a profound act of healing. It would demonstrate the true essence of repentance and forgiveness, offering a tangible example of living out the principles of compassion and empathy. It would show that faith is not just about belief but about action—about reaching out to those we have wronged and seeking to make amends. This is the God I would believe in, a God reflected in the courageous acts of those who follow Him.
Am I saying this would make me believe in God or in His involvement with your church? Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn’t. But it is in such places, through such actions, that I would continue to observe closely. I am searching, and if I found a place aligned with what I know to be right, I would want to delve deeper, eager to discover what I do not yet know. I recognize truth when I see it, and I am drawn to it.
As I’ve said, I will convey this message to my mother. However, as her pastor, your involvement could significantly impact Mary and her sister and my mother. If you spoke with my mother and facilitated a meeting with Mary and her sister, the gesture would be powerful.
As you’ve preached, the sin that does not lead to death is the sin that is quickly repented of. I will send you a copy of the passage from Mary’s book detailing what happened. It is my hope that you act swiftly upon this opportunity. If not, I will be the one providing my mother and others the chance to benefit from this experience.
This moment could be a testament to the true spirit of repentance and forgiveness, demonstrating that faith is not just about words but about actions. It could bring healing and reconciliation, showing that the church is a place where love and understanding prevail. This is the God I could believe in—a God reflected in the courageous and compassionate acts of His followers.

Dan: From “Misery To Ministry”
Bill was coming out to church with Toni.  Back in 1977, on Christmas day, Toni had miscarried in the 16th week.  I was in England at the time.  Toni’s baby would have been 7 months younger than my second son, Jason.  It was hard for her, but Toni was taught not to count her chickens before they hatched.  So, she just tried to think that it was not a baby and she shouldn’t be upset.
Toni got pregnant shortly after she accepted Christ, and I was excited!  I thought, How awesome this is! Eric was one year old and would be two in April; Toni’s baby was due in June 1982.  We always thought that we would have our children at the same time or very close in age.  Although Jason and Toni’s other baby would have been the same age, I was glad that Eric would be just two years older than this baby.
I planned for the baby shower to be when Toni was in her eighth month.  That way if she delivered early the baby should be okay.  After having Chuckie six weeks early and Jason ten weeks early, I knew how fragile life is.
We had a surprise baby shower at my home and invited a lot of family members.  Everyone was so excited because they felt terrible when Toni lost that other baby in the fourth month in 1977.  Bill’s daughter Tami was there and was also excited, because she was going to have a little brother or sister.  Tami was 7.5 years old; she was a sensitive little girl.
Tami said to me, “I hope what happened that last time won’t happen again.”  I said, “Sweetheart, that won’t happen.  She’s almost due….”  I went over to the trailer where Toni and Bill lived.  Bill had put the crib together, and Toni was very excited.  But I thought I heard God say that no baby would sleep in this crib in this house. 
About two weeks later I was sitting at the dinner table and I had this overwhelming sense that something was wrong with my sister.  I said to my husband, “Oh my God!  I feel like something is wrong, like Toni is sick or dying !!!!
Chuck knew how I had had dreams in the past that came true or feelings that had meaning.  I immediately called Toni; she was taking a nap, and she was very tired.  I asked how the baby was, and she said “Good, but it was weird that the baby kicked really hard earlier.”  I said I was just checking on her because I was worried.  “Don’t worry, I’m okay, just tired.”
The next day Toni said, “Mary, the baby’s not moving anymore.”
“Well, Toni, there’s not much room for the baby.”
A few days later Toni had an appointment with her OB/GYN, Dr. Ziver Huner.  When he went to listen for the heartbeat, there was silence.  He immediately asked if she was alone.  She said no, Bill had come with her.  Then Dr. Huner asked him to come in, and they talked and set up an ultrasound to be done immediately.  Toni went for the test and was very confused.  As they went down the hall Bill knew what was going on, but Toni was not getting it.  She asked Bill, “What are they going to do now to get the heartbeat back?” She said she felt the Lord say that everything would be okay.
She returned to the office and Dr. Huner told her and Bill that their baby had died.  Toni was unable to process the information…. He offered counseling.  Toni said no, she thought that it was WRONG to meet with a counselor because the church we attended spoke against it, and she wanted to do the right thing. At this church counseling was not recommended, and anyone who did see a counselor was somehow in error.
I was home when Toni and Bill left Dr. Huner’s office.  Bill knew that he had to bring Toni to see me.  I looked out and saw them getting out of the car, and I KNEW!  God said, “I am in control.”  I was devastated!!!!  Toni was devastated!!!!
I called the pastor’s house.  It was a Friday, and being Catholic I wondered what they would do to help us.  I was recently baptized and Toni was attending regularly.  The preacher’s wife got on the phone.  I was very upset and asked if she knew my sister.  She said yes, she had seen her in church.  I went on and told her that her baby died and that we would need a pastor or something like that for the funeral arrangements.  I asked, “What do you do in these situations?”  She said, “Nothing.  We do nothing.”  She never said she was sorry – just “nothing,” like it was no big deal!  She didn’t even say they would pray.
I thought, Oh…this church is much different than what I was brought up in.  I felt hurt by the lack of care and concern for a family in the church that was experiencing a devastating situation.  Although this did not make sense, I thought that God had sent me to this church and we were just expected to lean on God.  After their response I thought that I was wrong to expect anything from them. I did not trust my feelings or thoughts, so I assumed that I was wrong for contacting them. 
Finally, on June 1, 1982 Toni gave birth to her stillborn daughter, Therea Ann Wood.  Toni never went to counseling and therefore was not prepared for the birth.  She pretended that she was not going through this.  Although she did do some grieving, she never held Theresa.  The nurses at Community General Hospital were great.  Bill did look at their daughter and said she just looked like she was asleep.  She had dark hair, and later Toni found out from the nurse that she had really long eyelashes and she weighed 1 lb. 7 oz.  Later in the day Toni asked if she could see the baby now and maybe hold her… but it was too late.  If she had counseling she would have been prepared for this and would have known that she could have held the baby.
Toni was traumatized by the event.  She worked at a retail store on Erie Boulevard, and many customers asked her if she had a boy or girl. Tini told them she had a little girl but she was stillborn.  The customers and her co-workers were wonderful and compassionate to my sister. It was very difficult working in public with so many individuals having contact with Toni.

Bryan: Hi Dan. Thank you for listening so intently to the message of such an imperfect messenger as I. Your recall is almost perfect.
1. Right or wrong, I did intentionally include the subject of our human relationships and person-to-person sin. I am sure you recall something like this: “Don’t take this message as being for someone on the other side of the aisle. THEY should repent.” I’ll explain. I thought the Lord wanted us to focus on first things first — our relationship with Him. But of course you may be right. Shoulda included our person-to-person relationships as part of an inseparable package. I often operate under the principle “less is more,” sometimes to the detriment of the bigger picture.
2. I don’t know how to satisfy you when it comes to the Toni S story. What your mom did and said is coming to us as hearsay. I know your mom very well, and I’m not about to doubt or investigate her tender and compassionate nature based on hearsay.
3. Re your challenge, that you may believe in God when you find people who live sincerely in obedience to the teaching of Jesus… don’t throw down that gauntlet. Judge God on His own merit not on mine or anyone else’s. I fall pathetically short. But He sent His Son to pay the price of our sins. What He did for us is enough to inspire undying faith and loyalty.

Dan: Thank you for responding, Bryan. I understand your emphasis on personalizing the message, and I recall your mention of it that Sunday morning. However, my concern remains. It is crucial to openly communicate what we need forgiveness for. This has been my message from the beginning and remains so now.
You mentioned, “I don’t know how to satisfy you.” But it’s not about satisfying me; it’s about recognizing the validity of my points, which align with what God requires of us. The truth of the story isn’t as important as the moral implications. When people come to you claiming they’ve been wronged, do you ask for a witness? Isn’t it more important to show compassion and concern, regardless of evidence?
Consider the story of Mary and her sister’s loss. Whether a child truly died or the accuracy of the occurrence isn’t the point; the real issue is how we respond with empathy and support. This experience should teach us to be more compassionate and to encourage others to seek appropriate counseling, whether secular or otherwise. Regardless, as I’ve mentioned, should you not be willing to participate in this opportunity to help my mother, Mary, her sister, and others, I will certainly be the one to do so.

Dan: I awoke this morning with an eerie feeling, one that evokes memories of my conversations with my late father.  As I write to you, I am reminded of the profound dialogues we shared. My father, like you, held the position of pastor, and he too struggled with the weight of his responsibilities.
Despite my repeated requests, I still do not know if you have read my book. Your reluctance to engage in open and honest dialogue with me has left me feeling unheard and misunderstood. When I inquired about presenting my offer to your son, your response was absent. When I tried to discuss the disparaging comments you made about me years ago, you closed the door to any meaningful conversation. Your initial response to my first message indicated that a dialogue was unlikely due to my perceived caustic and cynical position. However, it is clear to anyone that I have approached you with sincerity and a genuine desire for understanding.
This situation reminds me of my early mornings with my father. While my siblings were at school and my mother was teaching kindergarten at the Academy, my father would approach me, seeking my opinion on handling sin within the church—an elder molesting his children, members engaging in fornication, and such. Despite offering my thoughts, he often chose to keep such matters hidden to maintain the church’s facade. Yet, these were not the most disturbing conversations; rather, it was those where I implored him to show more compassion and understanding.
Had my father opened his heart and relinquished his need for control, my mother would have been spared decades of separation from loved ones, including her sister and parents. His insistence on isolation and stringent actions to maintain separation from those he deemed capable of diminishing his control of others caused immense damage. Today, my mother’s parents are gone, and she can never amend that loss. However, she has found solace in a renewed relationship with her sister and others, including me, the very person my father stripped away from her in his efforts to control and isolate.
Now, I see the same pattern repeating with you. Your door is closed, and you resist any effort to reunite loving people. Outsiders often describe your church as one devoid of love. This perception stems from the lack of compassion, empathy, wisdom, and understanding. Like my father, who saw himself as a simple small-town preacher, you project yourself as a humble servant of God. Yet, your actions suggest otherwise.
As a pastor, it is your duty, as mandated by the scriptures, to facilitate the coming together of people who have faced life’s challenges. What is required of you, as it was of my father, is simple: step aside and allow the spirit to move.
Please, Pastor Bryan, consider opening your heart and embracing a path of compassion and empathy. Let us work together to reunite those who have been separated, to heal wounds, and to foster a community grounded in love and understanding.

Bryan: I have accountability to a group of experienced men and women of faith. I am honest with them about my failings and keep them appraised of my actions and communications. They have the power to censure and/or fire me. They decide how to take care of me. I would not want it any other way. You simply are not in a position to be part of that group.
I literally don’t have time, energy, or interest in giving you that kind of relationship with me. In fact, it would be inappropriate and impossible. Cmon, Dan, you should understand that.
Since you are so desperate to know about me and your book, I have not read it. I don’t plan to read it. I really don’t relish telling you this.
 

Dan: Hi Bryan,

Fortunately, you won’t need to fabricate stories to distance yourself from me. I live far away, and you may find solace in knowing that I will no longer seek answers or further discussion from you. Yet, before we part ways, I wish to leave you with a final reflection on the matter that began this thread: forgiveness.

Your recent comments about my supposed obsession with you, echoing past remarks for which you sought forgiveness, and your ongoing reluctance to address my concerns, hint at a lack of understanding or compassion. Despite this, should it matter to you, I forgive you for both the past and present wounds inflicted by your words.

Know this: while empathy and understanding seem absent in your responses, I harbor no resentment or ill feelings toward you. After this message, you will no longer be troubled by my outreach. Despite your disregard for my concerns, my door will always remain open, just as it is with my brother David. Should you ever wish to discuss something that weighs on your mind, I will not judge you for your past or present actions. I will gladly listen, offer my full attention, and do my best to support you in any sincere matter you bring forth.

Life is hard, and we all make mistakes. I have made many and will make many more. But when I recognize them, I strive to address them with compassion, empathy, and understanding, especially when they affect others. Good luck to you, Bryan, and my best wishes for your future endeavors.

The Beginning of COR

I grew up in Liverpool, a serene suburb of Syracuse, cradled in the heart of central New York State. Tucked away roughly 250 miles northwest of the bustling streets of New York City, it offered a quiet contrast. My mother, whose maiden name was Fannie Fortino, was immersed from birth in the vibrant culture of a large Italian family. Although she had just one sibling, my Aunt Maryjane, she was intricately connected to a sprawling network of cousins.

 

Life in our family was modest and unpretentious, with little emphasis on professional aspirations. On a farm along Bear Road, where my mother and her relatives were raised, school often took a back seat to the relentless demands of farm work—planting, harvesting, and tending to vegetables became their daily rhythm. Academic pursuits were secondary; neither my grandparents, my mother, nor her sister completed high school. My grandfather poured his life’s sweat into the nearby steel mill from which he eventually retired, carrying only the weight of his memories. My grandmother, meanwhile, spent her working years on the monotonous line at the Resnick Pocketbook Factory. She never did learn to drive, and I distinctly remember the anticipation in the factory parking lot, as my mother and I waited to catch sight of her at the end of each workday, signaled by the piercing sound of the five o’clock whistle.

 

 

In stark contrast to the gentle rhythms of farm life in Liverpool, my father’s early years in New Jersey were marked by shadows and struggles. As the eldest of five siblings and the only child from his mother’s previous relationship, he was raised by a stepfather. Though raised Catholic, his family life lacked the spiritual daily expressions that were integral to my mother’s upbringing. His childhood memories were not filled with warmth and camaraderie but were instead overshadowed by a pervasive sense of alienation and despair.

 

Fate intervened when my parents, still in their teens, met at my grandfather’s camp on Oneida Lake near Syracuse—a serendipitous encounter, given that my father’s aunt owned the neighboring camp. The sparks between them ignited swiftly, leading to a whirlwind courtship and marriage. My mother was just seventeen, and my father, twenty, when they exchanged vows. Following the wedding, my mother relocated to New Jersey to join my father, who was making a living as a commercial artist. Yet, the absence of her close-knit family circle soon weighed heavily on her. The yearning for the familiar comfort of home and the strong bonds she had left behind in Syracuse grew unbearable. Financial constraints initially held them back, but eventually, the pull of family grew too strong to resist, and they moved into the welcoming arms of my mother’s parents’ home.

 

My father was a man driven by relentless ambition and an entrepreneurial spirit. Starting his career journey with modest beginnings, he went door-to-door, capturing and selling family portraits. This grassroots endeavor eventually secured him a stable position as an artist at a local agency. It wasn’t long before his hard work enabled us to buy our own home, marking the first of many milestones in his professional life. Yet, his entrepreneurial spirit was far from satisfied; he soon ventured into starting his own business.

 

During my childhood, the rhythms of our family life were marked by frequent visits with family. My weekdays and weekends were filled with trips to my grandparents’ house and time spent with a multitude of cousins, as well as serene Sundays at the Presbyterian church perched atop the city’s nearby hill. While my mother, sister, and I cherished these familial bonds, my father divided his time between work, his outdoor hobbies like hunting and fishing, and quiet moments spent with the newspaper.

 

 

1970 was a pivotal year that brought significant changes to our lives. I was nine when we moved from our cozy one-story home in Bridgeport to a more spacious four-bedroom, two-story residence in Liverpool. At that time, my Aunt Maryjane had ventured to Houston, Texas, to start a new life. Coincidentally, my father was also scheduled to be in Houston, competing in a national rifle shooting contest against both military and civilian sharpshooters. During this trip, Aunt Maryjane invited him to a church meeting. Despite initial reservations, he agreed to attend and experienced a profound spiritual awakening that drastically altered the course of his life. Upon returning from Texas, he made the life-changing decision to leave his burgeoning business and dedicate himself to preaching. Our family home in Syracuse became a bustling center of fellowship, which gradually expanded to other homes and eventually to a dilapidated church in the town of Euclid. As the congregation grew, we moved from one church building to another, marking new chapters in an expanding community outreach.

 

As the church’s influence widened, so too did the strictness of its doctrines. What began as subtle shifts in ideology soon crystalized into a rigid framework that distinctly isolated us from those not in sync with our new way of life. By the time my senior year of high school rolled around, I found myself increasingly at odds with the rigid beliefs that had come to define our family’s existence. With a heavy heart, I voiced my disinterest in the church, bracing for the possibility of being cast out from my home. Surprisingly, however, I was allowed to stay.

 

From 1979 to 1981, I lived somewhat apart from the day-to-day activities of my family. On Sundays, as my family bustled in preparation for church, bickering over unplugged hair dryers and prolonged bathroom use, I sought refuge under a pillow, trying to muffle the sounds of their arguments. Throughout the week, I unwillingly became a confidant to my father, who expressed his growing frustrations with church matters, discussing congregants’ fornication, gossip, and other assorted sins. This period was also marked by an escalating breakdown in our community ties, culminating in 1981 when my own grandparents were excommunicated.

 

My refusal to sever ties with them precipitated the inevitable: I was instructed to leave my home. This was a harrowing moment, filled with deep pain, and I detailed the emotional ordeal in a heartfelt letter to my brother David, an excerpt of which is included in my book.

 

 

For the subsequent six years, my attempts to bridge the gap with my family were met with cold rejection. This deep-seated sense of abandonment not only fueled a profound identity crisis but also propelled me toward a psychological precipice. By 1987, at the tender age of 25, this crisis culminated in my involuntary commitment to Hutching Psychiatric Center. This poignant moment in my life marks the opening of my book, beginning with its first chapter, ‘Off at Grandma’s.’ Seated on my grandparents’ sofa, enveloped in a sea of memories, I delve into the formative days of my father’s church, the uncompromising doctrines we were expected to uphold, and the series of harrowing events that led to my hospitalization. Here, I lay bare the emotional and spiritual tumult that shaped these years, setting the stage for a journey of introspection and healing.

 

 

This memoir began as a therapeutic exercise—a means to navigate my past and seek reconnection with my estranged family. Over the span of thirty-six years, these pages have transformed from personal reflections into a profound exploration of familial bonds broken and the enduring quest for authenticity amidst the pressures of conformity. Through chronicling my attempts to mend the rift with my father and understanding the stark divergences within our beliefs, I have unearthed the universal truth that diversity and genuine self-expression are not just vital for individual integrity but are also the cornerstones of resilient relationships.

 

My narrative aims not only to offer a window into my own soul-searching journey but also to resonate with anyone grappling with similar familial estrangements or identity crises. It is my deepest hope that this book will not only serve as a cautionary tale but also inspire others to cherish their bonds with loved ones, to embrace the rich tapestry of human differences, and to find the courage to stand firm in their truths. May these reflections guide you towards reconciliation and peace, not by erasing differences, but by celebrating them as the very essence of our shared humanity.

 

 

Unveiling the Core of Christianity and the Spirit of Its Followers

In contemplating what it means to identify oneself as a Christian, one embarks on a profound exploration of faith, belief, and the essence of spirituality. This reflection is not intended as a sweeping judgment of the Christian community at large, for such a diverse and multifaceted group defies simple characterization. Instead, it is a personal observation, shaped by years of introspective thought and a life journey deeply intertwined with a Christian upbringing, from childhood through the complex weave of experiences among those professing to be followers of Christ.


To distill the essence of Christian belief is to navigate a vast ocean of doctrine, tradition, and personal conviction. However, from my vantage point, shaped by early exposure to a community self-identified with Christian values, a paradox emerges. It is a realization, perhaps unsettling, that the core values often attributed to the heart of Christianity—God’s love, and the virtues of honesty, bravery, empathy, and selflessness—often seemed conspicuously absent in the lived experiences within my church community. These virtues, though lauded in sermons and embedded in the teachings of Christ, were met with indifference, or even disdain, by some who professed them loudest.


Raised in an environment where self-interest and the pursuit of comfort seemed to eclipse a genuine engagement with the divine, I observed a dissonance between the preached and the practiced. The church, ostensibly a sanctuary for spiritual growth and communal support, sometimes felt more akin to a social club, its members drawn together not by a shared journey towards spiritual enlightenment or sacrifice but by the allure of comfort and familiarity.


And yet, amid this dissonance, my perspective found its own footing. It was not in the echoing halls of that church or in the superficial embrace of community that I encountered what might be called the Divine, but rather in the quiet, steadfast pursuit of the very virtues overlooked by others. In the teachings attributed to Christ, I discovered a call to transcend the ordinary, to live a life anchored not in the pursuit of personal comfort but in the embodiment of love, truth, and sacrifice. It is here, in the sincere endeavor to live out these virtues, that I find the truest expression of what it means to be Christian.


In this journey, the real essence of faith emerges not from the ostentatious displays of religiosity or the comfort-seeking tendencies of a congregation but from an individual’s quiet commitment to embodying the virtues that Christ himself exemplified. It is a path less trodden, marked by challenges and often solitude, yet it is here that one finds a profound connection to what could be considered divine—a beacon of light guiding us towards a deeper understanding of what it truly means to live a life of faith. This, then, is the essence of Christianity as I have come to understand it: a call to live a life of profound love, truth, and sacrifice, transcending the superficial to touch the very heart of what is universally humane.






    About the Title

    COR Values describes a phenomenon where individuals choose “comfort over reality,” leading to the creation of self-serving, distorted truths. The term “COR” encapsulates the tendency of people to shape narratives and beliefs more aligned with their personal desires than with objective reality. Through telling my life story, this book examines how people, driven by the COR mindset, manipulate information, rely on emotional persuasion, and even fabricate facts to shape a reality that serves their own agendas, overlooking the necessity for integrity and objectivity.

    The central allure of being COR lies in its comforting reassurance by affirming pre-existing beliefs or offering oversimplified solutions to complex issues, often based on falsehoods or half-truths. This, however, comes at a significant cost. It promotes a culture of evasion, where confronting uncomfortable truths and acknowledging the consequences of one’s actions is avoided. This avoidance fosters a societal environment where the rigorous demands of truth and reality are shunned.

    The impact of being COR is profound and far reaching. Individuals influenced by these values may find themselves unwittingly supporting harmful ideologies, participating in destructive behaviors, or isolating others based on distorted beliefs. The repercussions are not just personal, involving emotional distress and financial loss, but also societal, leading to division, conflict, and the deterioration of democratic principles. As these fabricated realities take hold, they undermine the bedrock of trust and critical thinking, essential for a healthy society.

    About the Book

    COR Values is a true and evocative story that captures the intricate dynamics of faith, family, and personal convictions. At the heart of this narrative is a pastor, deeply rooted in his beliefs of sin and salvation, who faces a profound dilemma when his wife’s sister decides to marry someone he considers a sinner. This situation challenges the very core of his teachings, which advocate for separation from sinners to maintain spiritual purity.

    The story takes a compelling turn as the pastor, in his commitment to familial unity, reluctantly promises to make peace with this new family member. The real twist, however, comes when the pastor unexpectedly develops a deep and authentic bond with his new brother-in-law, the very person he had labeled a sinner. This unexpected relationship not only brings to light the pastor’s internal struggles but also highlights the complexities and contradictions of his long-held beliefs.

    COR Values delves into the tension between doctrinal rigidity and the realities of human relationships. It presents a nuanced look at how life’s encounters can challenge and reshape our perspectives, compelling us to reconcile our professed values with our real-life experiences, and underscoring the repercussions of ignoring life’s imperative calls for change. This book is a powerful read for anyone interested in the journey of self-reflection and the challenge of confronting one’s own prejudices. It uncovers the beauty of forming significant connections in the most unexpected places and the profound, both personal and communal, repercussions of turning away from life’s prompts to evolve from our misjudgments. It’s a story about the transformative power of acceptance and the unpredictable nature of life that can lead us to question and, ultimately, deepen our understanding of our core values.

    The Story and Purpose

    In 1961, I entered the world within the walls of Saint Joseph’s Hospital in Syracuse, New York. My early years unfolded in a modest, single-story dwelling in Bridgeport, a quaint town where community and simplicity intertwined. My father, a New Jersey native, and my mother saw their paths converge following an unexpected encounter at a family camp. Barely adults, with my mother at seventeen and my father at twenty, they embarked on a journey of togetherness, sealing their bond in marriage.

    Their early family life began with a move to New Jersey, where my father worked as a commercial artist. Yet, the pull of familial bonds proved too strong for my mother, leading them back to the familiar embrace of Syracuse, where they nested within the welcoming space of my maternal grandparents’ home. This period of adjustment and growth eventually culminated in the acquisition of our Bridgeport home, marking a new chapter of stability and belonging.

    Life in Bridgeport was a blend of tradition and new beginnings. My mother, steadfast in her faith, continued to nurture us with the values of her Presbyterian upbringing, attending church with me and my older sister, Debbie. My father, however, charted his own course, finding enjoyment in the solitude of hunting or engaging in hobbies that spoke to his independent spirit.

    An entrepreneur at heart, my father co-founded Tri Art Studios, a venture that symbolized both a professional and personal milestone. Our family’s fortunes mirrored this upward trajectory, leading us to a spacious two-story house in Liverpool, complete with the trappings of suburban life. Amidst these developments, my father’s passion for rifle shooting flourished, pitting him against competitors nationwide, from military personnel to civilian sharpshooters.

    During one such competition in Houston, Texas, my father experienced a profound epiphany. Coincidentally, my mother’s sister, Aunt MaryJane, resided in Houston, and it was by her invitation that he attended a local church service. There, a moment of divine clarity struck him as the pastor’s words seemed to pierce the veil of anonymity, speaking directly to his soul. Overwhelmed by this encounter, he was consumed by a newfound conviction of God’s presence and purpose for his life, a revelation that propelled him into a fervent pursuit of his spiritual calling.

    After my father returned from Houston, discussions about God became a daily fixture in our household. Our home began hosting meetings that initially included a large contingent of cousins. I vividly recall being questioned while observing from the staircase, “Can’t you see your father has changed? Don’t you notice the glow on his face?” This query lingered in my mind as I watched my mother play the organ in the family room, peering through the ornate metal bars of the stairway railing.

    As time progressed, my father decided to leave his business behind. The religious gatherings, once confined to our living room, moved to a dilapidated church in the town of Euclid, with my father taking on the role of pastor. Under his guidance, the congregation expanded, necessitating moves to progressively larger facilities until finding its current home on Court Street Road in Syracuse.

    Aunt MaryJane, mirroring my mother’s yearning for familial closeness, returned to Syracuse and became an integral part of my father’s church. She, along with my grandparents, regularly attended the four weekly services and immersed herself in the community through friendships and numerous activities.

    The teachings at the church were stringent and constantly evolving, with a strong emphasis on adherence to its principles. One such expectation was the concept of being “equally yoked,” particularly in romantic relationships, discouraging associations with those deemed sinners. This policy limited relationship prospects to within our own congregation, branding other churches as lukewarm or misaligned with God’s expectations. However, my aunt found love outside these confines, at her workplace at General Motors, where she met a man whose character she deeply admired and eventually married.

    The pervasive discrimination and judgment against those with differing beliefs, whether religious or otherwise, motivated me to share my reflections and spurred the publication of my book. Throughout my life, I’ve witnessed firsthand the consequences of attempts to exert total control over loved ones and their environments, which restricts access to the world’s diverse perspectives on identity, origins, and potential purposes. My writing, the result of thousands of hours of work over 36 years, embodies a deep, relentless drive to illuminate and challenge the roots of division and prejudice. This imposition on individuals’ inherent rights to individuality and authenticity, arising from discrimination, fractures families and friendships, infiltrating various spheres under the guise of dogma. It’s a pattern that has become deeply integrated into my family’s religious practices, a cycle that urgently needs to be broken. My work aims to expose these divisive forces for what they truly are, advocating for an end to the dogmatism that segregates and isolates.

    More on COR

    In my hands, I visualize two spheres. Held in my right hand is the sphere of truth, symbolizing the reality underlying everything. In my left hand rests another sphere, representing our desires to satisfy both our physical and psychological needs. I perceive every decision as a balancing act between the influences of these two spheres.

    When evaluating individuals, it is their character that captures my attention. Character is the essence that sets individuals apart from one another. I seek signs of integrity, courage, honesty, loyalty, and respectfulness – hallmarks of a person’s ethical and moral fortitude. The predominance of these traits in an individual often indicates that their decisions are predominantly guided by the ‘right’ sphere, the realm of truth. Conversely, a deficiency in these qualities is likely to lead to decisions heavily influenced by the ‘left’ sphere, dedicated to physical and emotional indulgence. Those who recognize this pattern should not find it astonishing that a deficiency in character results in self-serving actions that veer away from the truth.

    It is a well-acknowledged fact across all domains of life, including religion, business, and politics, that prejudice and discrimination stem from such poor character. Indeed, these are selfish actions born from the craving for comfort, both physical and emotional, at the cost of forsaking reality and truth. The greater one’s emphasis on comfort, the ‘left’ sphere, the more one distances oneself from ‘truth’, the ‘right’ sphere.

    It is these individuals I have deemed to be ‘COR’, as they show favor of ‘comfort over reality’.